ArticlePLoS genetics2020
Inferring causal direction between two traits in the presence of horizontal pleiotropy with GWAS summary data.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bayesian Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Under Correlated and Uncorrelated Pleiotropy Using GWAS Summary Statistics.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
- Shared latent genetic liability across fibromyalgia and psychiatric traits: Novel insights from genomic structural equation modeling.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- A Modification to Two-Stage Least Squares With Genetic Applications.Statistics in medicine · 2025Article
- Causal association analysis between blood metabolomes and osteopenia and therapeutic target prediction for mechanomedicine.Mechanobiology in medicine · 2025Article
- Causality of genetically determined gut microbiota on lung cancer: a Mendelian randomization study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- A focusing framework for testing bi-directional causal effects in Mendelian randomization.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology · 2025Article
- Leveraging pleiotropic clustering to address high proportion correlated horizontal pleiotropy in Mendelian randomization studies.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Investigating the correlation between gut microbiota and prostate cancer through a two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis.Medicine · 2025Article
- Genetic risk predictions using deep learning models with summary data.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- The goldmine of GWAS summary statistics: a systematic review of methods and tools.BioData mining · 2024Article
- Inferring causal direction between two traits using RAmerican journal of human genetics · 2024Article
- A robust cis-Mendelian randomization method with application to drug target discovery.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Article
- MRSL: a causal network pruning algorithm based on GWAS summary data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Investigating potential novel therapeutic targets and biomarkers for ankylosing spondylitis using plasma protein screening.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Discovery and inference of a causal network with hidden confounding.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2024Article
- Heritable Traits and Lung Cancer Risk: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2023Article
- Can Intelligence Affect Alcohol-, Smoking-, and Physical Activity-Related Behaviors? A Mendelian Randomization Study.Journal of Intelligence · 2023Article
- Causal relationship in gut microbiota and upper urinary urolithiasis using Mendelian randomization.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Associating complex traits with genetic variants: polygenic risk scores, pleiotropy and endophenotypes.Genetica · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Orienting the causal relationship between pairs of traits is a fundamental task in scientific research with significant implications in practice, such as in prioritizing molecular targets and modifiable risk factors for developing therapeutic and interventional strategies for complex diseases. A recent method, called Steiger's method, using a single SNP as an instrument variable (IV) in the framework of Mendelian randomization (MR), has since been widely applied. We report the following new contributions. First, we propose a single SNP-based alternative, overcoming a severe limitation of Steiger's method in simply assuming, instead of inferring, the existence of a causal relationship. We also clarify a condition necessary for the validity of the methods in the presence of hidden confounding. Second, to improve statistical power, we propose combining the results from multiple, and possibly correlated, SNPs as multiple instruments. Third, we develop three goodness-of-fit tests to check modeling assumptions, including those required for valid IVs. Fourth, by relaxing one of the three IV assumptions in MR, we propose several methods, including an Egger regression-like approach and its multivariable version (analogous to multivariable MR), to account for horizontal pleiotropy of the SNPs/IVs, which is often unavoidable in practice. All our methods can simultaneously infer both the existence and (if so) the direction of a causal relationship, largely expanding their applicability over that of Steiger's method. Although we focus on uni-directional causal relationships, we also briefly discuss an extension to bi-directional relationships. Through extensive simulations and an application to infer the causal directions between low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, or high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and coronary artery disease (CAD), we demonstrate the superior performance and advantage of our proposed methods over Steiger's method and bi-directional MR. In particular, after accounting for horizontal pleiotropy, our method confirmed the well known causal direction from LDL to CAD, while other methods, including bi-directional MR, might fail.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.