Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33137120›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2020

Inferring causal direction between two traits in the presence of horizontal pleiotropy with GWAS summary data.

Haoran Xue, Wei Pan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A focusing framework for testing bi-directional causal effects in Mendelian randomization.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Inferring causal direction between two traits using RAmerican journal of human genetics · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Discovery and inference of a causal network with hidden confounding.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2024
    Article
  17. Heritable Traits and Lung Cancer Risk: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Haoran XueSchool of Statistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7923-6128
Wei PanDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1159-0582
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

Estimation and inference in directed acyclic graphical models for biological networksR01AG074858 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Wei Pan, XIAOTONG Tom SHEN · 2022 to 2026
$3.2M
Discovering causal genes, brain regions and other risk factors for Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG065636 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PAN, WEI · 2020 to 2024
$3.1M
Integrating Alzheimer's disease GWAS with proteomic and metabolomic QTL dataRF1AG067924 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PAN, WEI · 2020 to 2020
$1.9M
Estimation and Inference of Gene Regulatory NetworksR01GM126002 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PAN, WEI, SHEN, XIAOTONG TOM · 2017 to 2020
$1.4M
Statistical Methods for Genomic DataR01GM113250 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PAN, WEI · 2014 to 2017
$702k
Integrating genomic and imaging endophenotypes in GWASR21AG057038 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PAN, WEI · 2017 to 2018
$405k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG065636NIA NIH HHS R01 AG074858NIA NIH HHS R21 AG057038NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG067924NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM113250NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM126002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Orienting the causal relationship between pairs of traits is a fundamental task in scientific research with significant implications in practice, such as in prioritizing molecular targets and modifiable risk factors for developing therapeutic and interventional strategies for complex diseases. A recent method, called Steiger's method, using a single SNP as an instrument variable (IV) in the framework of Mendelian randomization (MR), has since been widely applied. We report the following new contributions. First, we propose a single SNP-based alternative, overcoming a severe limitation of Steiger's method in simply assuming, instead of inferring, the existence of a causal relationship. We also clarify a condition necessary for the validity of the methods in the presence of hidden confounding. Second, to improve statistical power, we propose combining the results from multiple, and possibly correlated, SNPs as multiple instruments. Third, we develop three goodness-of-fit tests to check modeling assumptions, including those required for valid IVs. Fourth, by relaxing one of the three IV assumptions in MR, we propose several methods, including an Egger regression-like approach and its multivariable version (analogous to multivariable MR), to account for horizontal pleiotropy of the SNPs/IVs, which is often unavoidable in practice. All our methods can simultaneously infer both the existence and (if so) the direction of a causal relationship, largely expanding their applicability over that of Steiger's method. Although we focus on uni-directional causal relationships, we also briefly discuss an extension to bi-directional relationships. Through extensive simulations and an application to infer the causal directions between low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, or high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and coronary artery disease (CAD), we demonstrate the superior performance and advantage of our proposed methods over Steiger's method and bi-directional MR. In particular, after accounting for horizontal pleiotropy, our method confirmed the well known causal direction from LDL to CAD, while other methods, including bi-directional MR, might fail.

Indexed as

Genetic PleiotropyGenome-Wide Association StudyModels, GeneticCholesterol, HDLComputational BiologyCoronary Artery DiseaseDatasets as TopicFeasibility StudiesHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSoftwareCholesterol, HDL

Identifiers

PMID33137120
PMCPMC7660933
OpenAlexW3094943518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.