ArticlePLoS genetics2020
A spectrum of verticality across genes.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rapid plastid isolation reveals the chloroplast proteome and structures of the chlororibosome large subunit and RuBisCO inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Oxygen reductase origin followed the great oxidation event and terminated the Lomagundi excursion.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Bioenergetics · 2026Article
- Functional Assessment of Orphan Proteins in theMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Tracing the evolutionary pathway: on the origin of mitochondria and eukaryogenesis.The FEBS journal · 2025Article
- A Perspective on the Role of Mitochondrial Biomolecular Condensates (mtBCs) in Neurodegenerative Diseases and Evolutionary Links to Bacterial BCs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Origin and evolution of mitochondrial inner membrane composition.Journal of cell science · 2025Review
- Distinct horizontal gene transfer potential of extracellular vesicles versus viral-like particles in marine habitats.Nature communications · 2025Article
- The early evolution of the glycolytic pathway from autotrophic origins to glycogen and back.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2025Review
- Surprising effects of differential loss in genome evolution: the last-one-out.FEMS microbiology letters · 2025Article
- Review
- The radical impact of oxygen on prokaryotic evolution-enzyme inhibition first, uninhibited essential biosyntheses second, aerobic respiration third.FEBS letters · 2024Article
- Cryptic diversity of cellulose-degrading gut bacteria in industrialized humans.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- A universal and constant rate of gene content change traces pangenome flux to LUCA.FEMS microbiology letters · 2024Article
- Functional Prokaryotic-Like Deoxycytidine Triphosphate Deaminases and Thymidylate Synthase in Eukaryotic Social Amoebae: Vertical, Endosymbiotic, or Horizontal Gene Transfer?Molecular biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Multiple approaches of cellular metabolism define the bacterial ancestry of mitochondria.Science advances · 2023Article
- Mitochondrial evolution: Gene shuffling, endosymbiosis, and signaling.Science advances · 2023Review
- Parameter Estimation and Species Tree Rooting Using ALE and GeneRax.Genome biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Functional comparison of metabolic networks across species.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Incompatibility and Interchangeability in Molecular Evolution.Genome biology and evolution · 2023Review
- Reply to: Phylogenetic affiliation of mitochondria with Alpha-II and Rickettsiales is an artefact.Nature ecology & evolution · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lateral gene transfer (LGT) has impacted prokaryotic genome evolution, yet the extent to which LGT compromises vertical evolution across individual genes and individual phyla is unknown, as are the factors that govern LGT frequency across genes. Estimating LGT frequency from tree comparisons is problematic when thousands of genomes are compared, because LGT becomes difficult to distinguish from phylogenetic artefacts. Here we report quantitative estimates for verticality across all genes and genomes, leveraging a well-known property of phylogenetic inference: phylogeny works best at the tips of trees. From terminal (tip) phylum level relationships, we calculate the verticality for 19,050,992 genes from 101,422 clusters in 5,655 prokaryotic genomes and rank them by their verticality. Among functional classes, translation, followed by nucleotide and cofactor biosynthesis, and DNA replication and repair are the most vertical. The most vertically evolving lineages are those rich in ecological specialists such as Acidithiobacilli, Chlamydiae, Chlorobi and Methanococcales. Lineages most affected by LGT are the α-, β-, γ-, and δ- classes of Proteobacteria and the Firmicutes. The 2,587 eukaryotic clusters in our sample having prokaryotic homologues fail to reject eukaryotic monophyly using the likelihood ratio test. The low verticality of α-proteobacterial and cyanobacterial genomes requires only three partners-an archaeal host, a mitochondrial symbiont, and a plastid ancestor-each with mosaic chromosomes, to directly account for the prokaryotic origin of eukaryotic genes. In terms of phylogeny, the 100 most vertically evolving prokaryotic genes are neither representative nor predictive for the remaining 97% of an average genome. In search of factors that govern LGT frequency, we find a simple but natural principle: Verticality correlates strongly with gene distribution density, LGT being least likely for intruding genes that must replace a preexisting homologue in recipient chromosomes. LGT is most likely for novel genetic material, intruding genes that encounter no competing copy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.