Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33137102›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2020

PhANNs, a fast and accurate tool and web server to classify phage structural proteins.

Vito Adrian Cantu, Peter Salamon, Victor Seguritan, Jackson Redfield, David Salamon, Robert A Edwards, Anca M Segall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Computational function prediction of bacteria and phage proteins.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Fold first, ask later: structure-informed function annotation ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vito Adrian CantuComputational Science Research Center, San Diego State University, San Diego, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3168-5140
Peter SalamonViral Information Institute, San Diego State University, San Diego, United States of America.
Victor SeguritanComputational Science Research Center, San Diego State University, San Diego, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6893-2846
Jackson RedfieldDepartment of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, United States of America.
David SalamonDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, San Diego State University, San Diego, United States of America.
Robert A EdwardsComputational Science Research Center, San Diego State University, San Diego, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8383-8949
Anca M SegallComputational Science Research Center, San Diego State University, San Diego, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8454-5248

Funding

Computational and Experimental Resources for Virome Analysis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (CERVAID)RC2DK116713 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, DAVID · 2019 to 2023
$8.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS RC2 DK116713
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For any given bacteriophage genome or phage-derived sequences in metagenomic data sets, we are unable to assign a function to 50-90% of genes, or more. Structural protein-encoding genes constitute a large fraction of the average phage genome and are among the most divergent and difficult-to-identify genes using homology-based methods. To understand the functions encoded by phages, their contributions to their environments, and to help gauge their utility as potential phage therapy agents, we have developed a new approach to classify phage ORFs into ten major classes of structural proteins or into an "other" category. The resulting tool is named PhANNs (Phage Artificial Neural Networks). We built a database of 538,213 manually curated phage protein sequences that we split into eleven subsets (10 for cross-validation, one for testing) using a novel clustering method that ensures there are no homologous proteins between sets yet maintains the maximum sequence diversity for training. An Artificial Neural Network ensemble trained on features extracted from those sets reached a test F1-score of 0.875 and test accuracy of 86.2%. PhANNs can rapidly classify proteins into one of the ten structural classes or, if not predicted to fall in one of the ten classes, as "other," providing a new approach for functional annotation of phage proteins. PhANNs is open source and can be run from our web server or installed locally.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinInternetBacteriophagesNeural Networks, ComputerReproducibility of ResultsViral Structural ProteinsViral Structural Proteins

Identifiers

PMID33137102
PMCPMC7660903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.