Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33137084›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2020

Integrating when and what information in the left parietal lobe allows language rule generalization.

Joan Orpella, Pablo Ripollés, Manuela Ruzzoli, Julià L Amengual, Alicia Callejas, Anna Martinez-Alvarez, Salvador Soto-Faraco, Ruth de Diego-Balaguer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. "What" and "When" Predictions Jointly Modulate Speech Processing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Auditory cortical regions show resting-state functional connectivity with the default mode-like network in echolocating bats.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Editorial: The musical brain, volume II.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. What made us "hunter-gatherers of words".Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joan OrpellaCognition and Brain Plasticity Unit, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9521-2900
Pablo RipollésDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Manuela RuzzoliCenter for Brain and Cognition, Departament de Tecnologies de la Informació i les Comunicacions, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1719-7140
Julià L AmengualCentre de Neuroscience Cognitive Marc Jeannerod, CNRS UMR 5229, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Bron, France.
Alicia CallejasCognition and Brain Plasticity Unit, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6922-1827
Anna Martinez-AlvarezCognition and Brain Plasticity Unit, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5551-8171
Salvador Soto-FaracoMusic and Auditory Research Laboratory (MARL), New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4799-3762
Ruth de Diego-BalaguerCognition and Brain Plasticity Unit, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2357-5195

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A crucial aspect when learning a language is discovering the rules that govern how words are combined in order to convey meanings. Because rules are characterized by sequential co-occurrences between elements (e.g., "These cupcakes are unbelievable"), tracking the statistical relationships between these elements is fundamental. However, purely bottom-up statistical learning alone cannot fully account for the ability to create abstract rule representations that can be generalized, a paramount requirement of linguistic rules. Here, we provide evidence that, after the statistical relations between words have been extracted, the engagement of goal-directed attention is key to enable rule generalization. Incidental learning performance during a rule-learning task on an artificial language revealed a progressive shift from statistical learning to goal-directed attention. In addition, and consistent with the recruitment of attention, functional MRI (fMRI) analyses of late learning stages showed left parietal activity within a broad bilateral dorsal frontoparietal network. Critically, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on participants' peak of activation within the left parietal cortex impaired their ability to generalize learned rules to a structurally analogous new language. No stimulation or rTMS on a nonrelevant brain region did not have the same interfering effect on generalization. Performance on an additional attentional task showed that this rTMS on the parietal site hindered participants' ability to integrate "what" (stimulus identity) and "when" (stimulus timing) information about an expected target. The present findings suggest that learning rules from speech is a two-stage process: following statistical learning, goal-directed attention-involving left parietal regions-integrates "what" and "when" stimulus information to facilitate rapid rule generalization.

Indexed as

AdultAttentionBrainBrain MappingCognitionFemaleFrontal LobeFunctional LateralityHumansLanguageLearningLinguisticsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleParietal LobePhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID33137084
PMCPMC7660506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.