ArticleEar and hearing
Effect of Increasing Pulse Phase Duration on Neural Responsiveness of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve.
Article in Ear and hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- A new method for removing artifacts from recordings of the electrically evoked compound action potential: Single-pulse stimulation.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Relationship between electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and behavioral T-levels in implanted children with cochlear nerve deficiency.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Comparison of response properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve reported in human listeners and in animal models.Hearing research · 2022Review
- Effect of inner ear malformations on intraoperative ECAP thresholds and postoperative auditory performance.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2022Article
- Interpreting the interphase gap effect on the electrically evoked compound action potential.JASA express letters · 2022Article
- A surgeon-scientist's perspective and review of cognitive-linguistic contributions to adult cochlear implant outcomes.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2020Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this study is to (1) investigate the effects of increasing the pulse phase duration (PPD) on the neural response of the electrically stimulated cochlear nerve (CN) in children with CN deficiency (CND) and (2) compare the results from the CND population to those measured in children with normal-sized CNs.
designStudy participants included 30 children with CND and 30 children with normal-sized CNs. All participants used a Cochlear Nucleus device in the test ear. For each subject, electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP) input/output (I/O) functions evoked by single biphasic pulses with different PPDs were recorded at three electrode locations across the electrode array. PPD durations tested in this study included 50, 62, 75, and 88 μsec/phase. For each electrode tested for each study participant, the amount of electrical charge corresponding to the maximum comfortable level measured for the 88 μsec PPD was used as the upper limit of stimulation. The eCAP amplitude measured at the highest electrical charge level, the eCAP threshold (i.e., the lowest level that evoked an eCAP), and the slope of the eCAP I/O function were measured. Generalized linear mixed effect models with study group, electrode location, and PPD as the fixed effects and subject as the random effect were used to compare these dependent variables measured at different electrode locations and PPDs between children with CND and children with normal-sized CNs.
resultsChildren with CND had smaller eCAP amplitudes, higher eCAP thresholds, and smaller slopes of the eCAP I/O function than children with normal-sized CNs. Children with CND who had fewer electrodes with a measurable eCAP showed smaller eCAP amplitudes and flatter eCAP I/O functions than children with CND who had more electrodes with eCAPs. Increasing the PPD did not show a statistically significant effect on any of these three eCAP parameters in the two subject groups tested in this study.
conclusionsFor the same amount of electrical charge, increasing the PPD from 50 to 88 μsec for a biphasic pulse with a 7 μsec interphase gap did not significantly affect CN responsiveness to electrical stimulation in human cochlear implant users. Further studies with different electrical pulse configurations are warranted to determine whether evaluating the eCAP sensitivity to changes in the PPD can be used as a testing paradigm to estimate neural survival of the CN for individual cochlear implant users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.