Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33136506›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs (Project Hope)2020

Variation In The Effectiveness Of Collaborative Care For Depression: Does It Matter Where You Get Your Care?

Jürgen Unützer, Andrew C Carlo, Robert Arao, Melinda Vredevoogd, John Fortney, Diane Powers, Joan Russo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs (Project Hope), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. A Positive Distress Screen…Now What? An Updated Call for Integrated Psychosocial Care.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Becoming an Agile Change Conductor.Frontiers in public health · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jürgen UnützerJürgen Unützer (unutzer@uw.edu) is a professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, in Seattle, Washington.
Andrew C CarloAndrew C. Carlo is a senior fellow in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington.
Robert AraoRobert Arao is a research scientist in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington.
Melinda VredevoogdMelinda Vredevoogd is a research program manager in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington.
John FortneyJohn Fortney is a professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington.
Diane PowersDiane Powers is a research scientist in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington.
Joan RussoJoan Russo is an associate professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington.

Funding

Training Geriatric Mental Health Services ResearchersT32MH073553 · NIMH · DARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK CLINIC · PI BRUCE, MARTHA L · 2005 to 2019
$6.4M
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH073553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that the collaborative care model for depression in primary care is more effective than usual care, but little is known about the effectiveness of this approach in real-world settings. We used patient-reported outcome data from 11,303 patients receiving collaborative care for depression in 135 primary care clinics to examine variations in depression outcomes. The average treatment response across this large sample of clinics was substantially lower than response rates reported in randomized controlled trials, and substantial outcome variation was observed. Patient factors such as initial depression severity, clinic factors such as the number of years of collaborative care practice, and the degree of implementation support received were associated with depression outcomes at follow-up. Our findings suggest that the level of implementation support could be an important influence on the effectiveness of collaborative care model programs.

Indexed as

DepressionPrimary Health CareHumansPatient Care TeamTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID33136506
PMCPMC10846930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.