ReviewPituitary2021
Chiasmapexy for secondary empty sella syndrome: diagnostic and therapeutic considerations.
Review in Pituitary, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiographic pituitary stalk disruption: A rare sequela of secondary empty sella syndrome.Surgical neurology international · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSecondary empty sella syndrome (SESS) following pituitary surgery remains a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. The aim of this study was to specify the diagnostic criteria, surgical indications and results of chiasmapexy in the SESS.
methodsThree cases from two experienced neurosurgical centers were collected and the available literature was reviewed.
resultsThe 3 patients were operated for a giant non-functioning pituitary adenoma, a cystic macroprolactinoma, and an arachnoid cyst respectively. Postoperative visual outcome was initially improved, and then worsened progressively. At the time of SESS diagnosis, visual field defect was severe in all cases with optic nerve (ON) atrophy in 2 cases. Patients were operated via an endoscopic endonasal extradural approach. One patient was re-operated because of early fat reabsorption. Visual outcome improved in 1 case and stabilized in 2 cases. Statistical analyses performed on 24 cases from the literature review highlighted that patient age and severity of the preoperative visual defect were respectively significant and nearly significant prognostic factors for visual outcome, unlike the surgical technique.
conclusionT2-weighted or CISS/FIESTA sequence MRI is mandatory to visualize adhesions, ON kinking and neurovascular conflict. TS approach is the most commonly used approach. The literature review could not conclude on the need for an intra or extradural approach suggesting case by case adapted strategy. Intrasellar packing with non-absorbable material such as bone should be considered. Severity of the visual loss clearly decreases the visual outcome suggesting early chiasmapexy. In case of severe and long standing symptoms before surgery, benefits and surgical risks should be carefully balanced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.