ReviewLa Radiologia medica2021
Hemopericardium in the acute clinical setting: Are we ready for a tailored management approach on the basis of MDCT findings?
Review in La Radiologia medica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spontaneous Pleural, Pericardial, and Intracranial Hemorrhages in a Patient with End-Stage Kidney Disease Receiving Apixaban: A Case Report.The American journal of case reports · 2025Article
- CT diagnosis and destiny of acute aortic intramural hematoma.Frontiers in radiology · 2025Review
- Lung Involvement in Pulmonary Vasculitis: A Radiological Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Heart Failure and Cardiomyopathies: CT and MR from Basics to Advanced Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging: state of the art and applications in whole-body imaging.Japanese journal of radiology · 2022Review
- Stress Perfusion Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Long-Standing Non-Infarcted Chronic Coronary Syndrome with Preserved Systolic Function.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Current Standards for and Clinical Impact of Emergency Radiology in Major Trauma.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The clinical spectrum of pericardial effusions varies from innocuous serous fluid to life-threatening hemopericardium. A misdiagnosis may be made by similar clinical presentation of acute chest pain/hypotension. Echocardiography is the first-line test for diagnosis of pericardial effusion and its etiology, but sometimes there are different drawbacks to the correct cardiovascular ultrasound diagnosis. Radiologists are reporting an increasing amount of thoracic Multidetector CT examinations at the emergency department. Multidetector CT has now become an established and complementary method for cardiac imaging, and diseases of the pericardium can now be quickly identified with increasing certainty. The aim of this review is to discuss the hemopericardium key Multidetector CT features in acute clinical setting which indicate the need to proceed with predominantly medical or surgical treatment, however, being able to identify forms of bleeding pericardial effusion for which only "a watch and wait strategy" and/or deferred treatment is indicated. In the emergency care setting, radiologists must be aware of different findings of hemopericardium in order to address a tailored and timely management approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.