Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33136212›Full record

SynthesisHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2021

Intestinal erosions following inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review.

Nikolaos Koliakos, Dimitrios Papaconstantinou, Constantinos Nastos, George Kirkilesis, Georgia Bompetsi, Anargyros Bakopoulos, Vasileia Ntomi, Emmanouil Pikoulis

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Comment to: intestinal erosions following inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nikolaos KoliakosThird Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Rimini 1 Str., Chaidari, Athens, 12462, Greece.
Dimitrios PapaconstantinouThird Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Rimini 1 Str., Chaidari, Athens, 12462, Greece. Dimpapa7@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2319-4923
Constantinos NastosThird Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Rimini 1 Str., Chaidari, Athens, 12462, Greece.
George KirkilesisThird Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Rimini 1 Str., Chaidari, Athens, 12462, Greece.
Georgia BompetsiThird Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Rimini 1 Str., Chaidari, Athens, 12462, Greece.
Anargyros BakopoulosThird Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Rimini 1 Str., Chaidari, Athens, 12462, Greece.
Vasileia NtomiThird Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Rimini 1 Str., Chaidari, Athens, 12462, Greece.
Emmanouil PikoulisThird Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Rimini 1 Str., Chaidari, Athens, 12462, Greece.
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo sum all available evidence regarding mesh or mesh fixation material intestinal erosion following inguinal hernia repair and identify the parameters that lead to early (< 6 months) versus late (> 6 months) symptom presentation.

methodsA systematic literature search of the MEDLINE, Scopus and Google Scholar databases was undertaken to identify relevant studies published up to June 2020.

resultsA total of 54 case reports or cases series, incorporating 57 intestinal erosions were identified. Overall, 13 patients (23%) experienced early intestinal erosions occurring during the first 6 postoperative months while the remaining 44 events (67%) occurred after 6 months. Patients presented most commonly with symptoms of acute obstruction (n = 18, 31.5%), followed by signs of a palpable inguinal mass in 15 patients (26.3%). The late presentation group exhibited significantly more cases of mesh erosion when compared to the early presentation group (100% versus 46.2%, respectively, p < 0.001). Conversely, early presenting cases were more often associated with mesh fixation material erosion (53.8% versus 6.8% in the late group, p < 0.001) and were more likely to develop symptoms of acute intestinal obstruction (61.5% versus 22.8%, p = 0.01). An open primary procedure was more common in late presenting cases (65.9% versus 7.7%, p < 0.001) while early presentation was linked to minimally invasive primary procedures (92.3% versus 34.2%, p < 0.001). Bowel resection was more frequently required in late presenting cases (84.1% versus 46.2%, p = 0.009).

conclusionsIntestinal erosion from prosthetic material is a rare complication of hernia repair leading to considerable morbidity. Prompt operative repair is key in avoiding catastrophic consequences.

Indexed as

Hernia, InguinalLaparoscopyGroinHerniorrhaphyHumansSurgical MeshInguinal hernia repairMesh erosionMesh-fixating material migrationMesh migration

Identifiers

PMID33136212
OpenAlexW3096158712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.