Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33136138›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2021

Difficulties with Speech-in-Noise Perception Related to Fundamental Grouping Processes in Auditory Cortex.

Emma Holmes, Peter Zeidman, Karl J Friston, Timothy D Griffiths

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Perceptual and Cognitive Effects of Focal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of Auditory Cortex in Tinnitus.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Aging in the Primary Auditory Cortex.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Spectral Grouping of Electrically Encoded Sound Predicts Speech-in-Noise Performance in Cochlear Implantees.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emma HolmesWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London WC1N 3AR, UK.
Peter ZeidmanWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London WC1N 3AR, UK.
Karl J FristonWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London WC1N 3AR, UK.
Timothy D GriffithsWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London WC1N 3AR, UK.
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GB

Funding

Speech Production &LanguageP50DC000242 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Inyong Choi · 1989 to 2026
$58.8M
Medical Research Council MR/T032553/1NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC000242Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 203147/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust WT091681MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In our everyday lives, we are often required to follow a conversation when background noise is present ("speech-in-noise" [SPIN] perception). SPIN perception varies widely-and people who are worse at SPIN perception are also worse at fundamental auditory grouping, as assessed by figure-ground tasks. Here, we examined the cortical processes that link difficulties with SPIN perception to difficulties with figure-ground perception using functional magnetic resonance imaging. We found strong evidence that the earliest stages of the auditory cortical hierarchy (left core and belt areas) are similarly disinhibited when SPIN and figure-ground tasks are more difficult (i.e., at target-to-masker ratios corresponding to 60% rather than 90% performance)-consistent with increased cortical gain at lower levels of the auditory hierarchy. Overall, our results reveal a common neural substrate for these basic (figure-ground) and naturally relevant (SPIN) tasks-which provides a common computational basis for the link between SPIN perception and fundamental auditory grouping.

Indexed as

AdultAttentionAuditory CortexFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNoisePerceptual MaskingSpeech Perceptionauditory scene analysisDCMfigure-groundfMRIspeech perception

Identifiers

PMID33136138
PMCPMC7869094
OpenAlexW2981397724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.