Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33136060›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2020

Implementing Individually Tailored Prescription of Physical Activity in Routine Clinical Care: Protocol of the Physicians Implement Exercise = Medicine (PIE=M) Development and Implementation Project.

Leonie A Krops, Adrie J Bouma, Femke Van Nassau, Joske Nauta, Inge van den Akker-Scheek, Willem Jr Bossers, Johan Brügemann, Laurien M Buffart, Ronald L Diercks, Vincent De Groot and 17 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Leonie A KropsDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1721-3953
Adrie J BoumaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5294-5044
Femke Van NassauDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3726-550X
Joske NautaDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4516-1049
Inge van den Akker-ScheekDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1614-8419
Willem Jr BossersThe Lifelines Cohort Study, Roden, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9620-7062
Johan BrügemannDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5155-851X
Laurien M BuffartDepartment of Physiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8095-436X
Ronald L DiercksDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9873-208X
Vincent De GrootAmsterdam Movement Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6073-6250
Johan De JongResearch Group Applied Sports Science, School of Sports Studies, Hanze University of Applied Sciences Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8300-3861
Caroline S KampshoffDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8319-1409
Marike Van der LeedenAmsterdam Movement Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6465-0983
Hans LeutscherKnowledge Centre for Sport & Physical Activity, Ede, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0875-753X
Gerjan J NavisDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0616-0166
Salome ScholtensGenomics Coordination Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0651-5203
Martin StevensDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8183-6894
Morris A SwertzGenomics Coordination Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0979-3401
Sacha Van TwillertCenter of Expertise on Quality and Safety, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2476-8781
Joeri Van der VeldeGenomics Coordination Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0934-8375
Johannes ZwerverCenter for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8499-2806
Lucas Hv Van der WoudeCenter for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8472-334X
Willem Van MechelenDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7136-6382
Evert Alm VerhagenDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9227-8234
Helco G Van KeekenCenter for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8063-4801
Hidde P Van der PloegDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3719-5249
Rienk DekkerDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6649-6289
University Medical Center Groningen · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLHanze University of Applied Sciences · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prescription of physical activity (PA) in clinical care has been advocated worldwide. This "exercise is medicine" (E=M) concept can be used to prevent, manage, and cure various lifestyle-related chronic diseases. Due to several challenges, E=M is not yet routinely implemented in clinical care.

objectiveThis paper describes the rationale and design of the Physicians Implement Exercise = Medicine (PIE=M) study, which aims to facilitate the implementation of E=M in hospital care.

methodsPIE=M consists of 3 interrelated work packages. First, levels and determinants of PA in different patient and healthy populations will be investigated using existing cohort data. The current implementation status, facilitators, and barriers of E=M will also be investigated using a mixed-methods approach among clinicians of participating departments from 2 diverse university medical centers (both located in a city, but one serving an urban population and one serving a more rural population). Implementation strategies will be connected to these barriers and facilitators using a systematic implementation mapping approach. Second, a generic E=M tool will be developed that will provide tailored PA prescription and referral. Requirements for this tool will be investigated among clinicians and department managers. The tool will be developed using an iterative design process in which all stakeholders reflect on the design of the E=M tool. Third, we will pilot-implement the set of implementation strategies, including the E=M tool, to test its feasibility in routine care of clinicians in these 2 university medical centers. An extensive learning process evaluation will be performed among clinicians, department managers, lifestyle coaches, and patients using a mixed-methods design based on the RE-AIM framework.

resultsThis project was approved and funded by the Dutch grant provider ZonMW in April 2018. The project started in September 2018 and continues until December 2020 (depending on the course of the COVID-19 crisis). All data from the first work package have been collected and analyzed and are expected to be published in 2021. Results of the second work package are described. The manuscript is expected to be published in 2021. The third work package is currently being conducted in clinical practice in 4 departments of 2 university medical hospitals among clinicians, lifestyle coaches, hospital managers, and patients. Results are expected to be published in 2021.

conclusionsThe PIE=M project addresses the potential of providing patients with PA advice to prevent and manage chronic disease, improve recovery, and enable healthy ageing by developing E=M implementation strategies, including an E=M tool, in routine clinical care. The PIE=M project will result in a blueprint of implementation strategies, including an E=M screening and referral tool, which aims to improve E=M referral by clinicians to improve patients' health, while minimizing the burden on clinicians.

Indexed as

cliniciansconventional treatmentExercise is Medicine initiativeexercise referralhospital carephysical activity

Identifiers

PMID33136060
PMCPMC7669441
OpenAlexW3038684801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.