Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33136020›Full record

ArticleThe journal of international advanced otology2020

Normative Data of Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Response to Chirp Stimulus.

Ceren Karaçaylı, Fatma Ceyda Akın Öçal, Volkan Kenan Çoban, Bülent Satar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of international advanced otology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ceren KaraçaylıDepartment of Audiology, University of Health Science Turkey, Gulhane Faculty of Health Science, Ankara, Turkey.
Fatma Ceyda Akın ÖçalDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Health Science Turkey, Gülhane Traning and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Volkan Kenan ÇobanDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Health Science Turkey, Gülhane Traning and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Bülent SatarDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Health Science Turkey, Gulhane Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aims at comparing the tone-burst (TB) and narrow-band (NB) CE-chirp stimuli in terms of amplitude, latency, and interaural asymmetry ratio (IAR) in ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMP). MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this prospective study, we enrolled 60 healthy subjects (27 men, 33 women) with a mean age of 25.83 (range, 18-48) years. Otological examination was normal in all the subjects. The subjects did not have any otological disease. All the subjects underwent oVEMP testing. We used 500 Hz TB stimulus and 500 Hz NB CE-chirp stimulus in random order. oVEMP test was performed at 100 dB normalized hearing level. P1 latency, N1 latency, and P1N1 amplitude were measured for each ear and stimulus, and IAR was calculated.

resultsOcular VEMPs were obtained from all the subjects for both the stimuli. P1 and N1 latencies were significantly shorter in chirp stimulus than in TB stimulus for both the sides (p<0.0001). P1 and N1 amplitudes were significantly higher for chirp stimulus than for TB stimulus for both the sides (p<0.0001). There was no significant difference between the ears in IAR between the 2 types of stimuli.

conclusionNarrow-band CE-chirp stimulus is an effective stimulus to evoke oVEMP with higher amplitudes and shortened latencies.

Indexed as

Vestibular Evoked Myogenic PotentialsAcoustic StimulationAdolescentAdultFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33136020
PMCPMC7901469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.