Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33135462›Full record

ArticleBone & joint research2020

Effect of material selection on tibial post stresses in posterior-stabilized knee prosthesis.

Chang-Hung Huang, Yung-Chang Lu, Lin-I Hsu, Jiann-Jong Liau, Ting-Kuo Chang, Chun-Hsiung Huang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Accuracy of patellar tendon at the attachment as anatomic landmark for rotational alignment of tibial component].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chang-Hung HuangDepartment of Medical Research, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9936-0182
Yung-Chang LuDepartment of Medical Research, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Lin-I HsuDepartment of Medical Research, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jiann-Jong LiauSchool of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ting-Kuo ChangDepartment of Medical Research, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chun-Hsiung HuangDepartment of Medicine, MacKay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWMackay Memorial Hospital · TWTaipei Medical University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe material and design of knee components can have a considerable effect on the contact characteristics of the tibial post. This study aimed to analyze the stress distribution on the tibial post when using different grades of polyethylene for the tibial inserts. In addition, the contact properties of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing inserts were evaluated.

methodsThree different grades of polyethylene were compared in this study; conventional ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE), highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE), and vitamin E-stabilized polyethylene (VEPE). In addition, tibial baseplates with a fixed-bearing and a mobile-bearing insert were evaluated to understand differences in the contact properties. The inserts were implanted in neutral alignment and with a 10° internal malrotation. The contact stress, von Mises stress, and equivalent plastic strain (PEEQ) on the tibial posts were extracted for comparison.

resultsThe stress and strain on the tibial post for the three polyethylenes greatly increased when the insert was placed in malrotation, showing a 38% to 56% increase in von Mises stress and a 335% to 434% increase in PEEQ. The VEPE insert had the lowest PEEQ among the three materials. The mobile-bearing design exhibited a lower increase in stress and strain around the tibial posts than the fixed-bearing design.

conclusionUsing VEPE for the tibial component potentially eliminates the risk of material permanent deformation. The mobile-bearing insert can help to avoid a dramatic increase in plastic strain around the tibial post in cases of malrotation. The mobility allows the pressure to be distributed on the tibial post and demonstrated lower stresses with all three polyethylenes simulated. Cite this article:

Indexed as

Highly cross-linkedMalpositionPolyethyleneStress-strain distributionVitamin E-stabilized

Identifiers

PMID33135462
PMCPMC7649505
OpenAlexW3095407208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.