Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33135329›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine2020

A de novo mutation in KRT5 in a crossbred calf with epidermolysis bullosa simplex.

Joana G P Jacinto, Irene M Häfliger, Inês M B Veiga, Cord Drögemüller, Jørgen S Agerholm

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. IndependentGenes · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Joana G P JacintoDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6438-7975
Irene M HäfligerInstitute of Genetics, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5648-963X
Inês M B VeigaInstitute of Animal Pathology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8554-790X
Cord DrögemüllerInstitute of Genetics, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9773-522X
Jørgen S AgerholmDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1653-4552
University of Bern · CHUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A 6-day-old Belgian Blue-Holstein calf was referred because of a syndrome resembling epidermolysis bullosa simplex (EBS). The clinical phenotype included irregular and differently sized erosions and ulcerations spread over the body, in particular on the limbs and over bone prominences, as well as in the nasal planum and oral mucosa. Blisters were easily induced by rubbing the skin. The skin lesions displayed a clear dermal-epidermal separation at the level of the basal cell layer. Post mortem examination revealed erosions in the pharynx, proximal esophagus, and rumen. Whole-genome sequencing revealed a heterozygous disruptive in-frame deletion variant in KRT5 (c.534_536delCAA). Genotyping of both parents confirmed the variant as de novo mutation. Clinicopathological and genetic findings were consistent with the diagnosis of KRT5-related EBS providing the second example of a spontaneous mutation causing epidermolysis bullosa in cattle.

Indexed as

Cattle DiseasesEpidermolysis Bullosa SimplexAnimalsCattleKeratin-5MutationPhenotypeSkinKeratin-5cattleKRT5precision medicineskin fragilityWGS

Identifiers

PMID33135329
PMCPMC7694802
OpenAlexW3095826334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.