Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33135239›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging2021

Prediction of Meningioma WHO Grade Using PET Findings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

K Mariam Slot, Dagmar Verbaan, Dennis R Buis, Linda J Schoonmade, Bart N M Berckel, W Peter Vandertop

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. World journal of nuclear medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K Mariam SlotDepartment of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5680-5620
Dagmar VerbaanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dennis R BuisDepartment of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Linda J SchoonmadeMedical Library, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bart N M BerckelDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
W Peter VandertopDepartment of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeWorld Health Organization (WHO) grading of meningiomas reflects recurrence rate and prognosis. Positron emission tomography (PET) investigates metabolic activity, allowing for distinction between low- and high-grade tumors. As preoperative suspicion for malignant meningioma will influence surgical strategy in terms of timing, extent of resection, and risks taken to achieve a total resection, we systematically reviewed the literature on PET-imaging in meningiomas and relate these findings to histopathological analysis.

methodsSearches in PubMed, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library, from inception to September 2019, included studies of patients who had undergone surgery for a histologically verified intracranial meningioma, with a PET-scan prior to surgery and description of (semi)quantitative PET values for meningiomas from two different WHO groups. Studies comparing more than 1 patient per WHO group were included in the meta-analysis.

resultsTwenty-two studies (432 patients) were included. 18fluor-fluorodesoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET was mostly described to differentiate benign from malignant meningiomas. Pooled data showed differences in mean (95% CI) Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) for WHO II/III compared to WHO I of 2.51 (1.36, 3.66), and in tumor-to-normal (T/N) ratio (T/N ratio) for WHO II/III versus WHO I of .42 (.12, .73).

conclusionsWe found that SUV and T/N ratio in 18F-FDG PET may be useful to noninvasively differentiate benign from malignant meningiomas. T/N ratio seems to have a high specificity for the detection of high-grade meningiomas. Other PET tracers were studied too infrequently to draw definitive conclusions. Before treatment strategies can be adapted based on 18F-FDG PET, prospective studies in larger cohorts are warranted to validate the optimal T/N ratio cutoff point.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaPositron-Emission TomographyPrognosisWorld Health OrganizationFluorodeoxyglucose F18Meningiomasmeta-analysispositron emission tomographyWHO grade

Identifiers

PMID33135239
PMCPMC7894181
OpenAlexW3095388216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.