Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33134902›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2020

Diagnosis of COVID-19 by analysis of breath with gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry - a feasibility study.

Dorota M Ruszkiewicz, Daniel Sanders, Rachel O'Brien, Frederik Hempel, Matthew J Reed, Ansgar C Riepe, Kenneth Bailie, Emma Brodrick, Kareen Darnley, Richard Ellerkmann and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
14.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 225 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Dorota M RuszkiewiczCentre for Analytical Science, Chemistry, School of Science, Loughborough University, LE11 3TU, United Kingdom.
Daniel SandersG.A.S. Gesellschaft für analytische Sensorsysteme mbH BioMedizinZentrumDortmund, Dortmund, DE, Germany.
Rachel O'BrienEmergency Medicine Research Group Edinburgh (EMERGE), Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, United Kingdom.
Frederik HempelKlinikum Dortmund, Beurhausstr. 40, 44137 Dortmund, DE, Germany.
Matthew J ReedEmergency Medicine Research Group Edinburgh (EMERGE), Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, United Kingdom.
Ansgar C RiepeKlinikum Dortmund, Beurhausstr. 40, 44137 Dortmund, DE, Germany.
Kenneth BailieEmergency Medicine Research Group Edinburgh (EMERGE), Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, United Kingdom.
Emma BrodrickIMSPEX Diagnostics Ltd, Ty Menter, Navigation Park, Abercynon, RCT CF45 4SN, United Kingdom.
Kareen DarnleyWellcome Clinical Research Facility, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, United Kingdom.
Richard EllerkmannKlinikum Dortmund, Beurhausstr. 40, 44137 Dortmund, DE, Germany.
Oliver MuellerKlinikum Dortmund, Beurhausstr. 40, 44137 Dortmund, DE, Germany.
Angelika SkaryszComputer Science Department, School of Science, Loughborough University, United Kingdom.
Michael TrussKlinikum Dortmund, Beurhausstr. 40, 44137 Dortmund, DE, Germany.
Thomas WortelmannG.A.S. Gesellschaft für analytische Sensorsysteme mbH BioMedizinZentrumDortmund, Dortmund, DE, Germany.
Simeon YordanovKlinikum Dortmund, Beurhausstr. 40, 44137 Dortmund, DE, Germany.
C L Paul ThomasCentre for Analytical Science, Chemistry, School of Science, Loughborough University, LE11 3TU, United Kingdom.
Bernhard SchaafG.A.S. Gesellschaft für analytische Sensorsysteme mbH BioMedizinZentrumDortmund, Dortmund, DE, Germany.
Michael EddlestonPharmacology, Toxicology & Therapeutics, Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Klinikum Dortmund · DEEdinburgh Royal Infirmary · GBLoughborough University · GBNHS Lothian · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is an urgent need to rapidly distinguish COVID-19 from other respiratory conditions, including influenza, at first-presentation. Point-of-care tests not requiring laboratory- support will speed diagnosis and protect health-care staff. We studied the feasibility of using breath-analysis to distinguish these conditions with near-patient gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (GC-IMS).

methodsIndependent observational prevalence studies at Edinburgh, UK, and Dortmund, Germany, recruited adult patients with possible COVID-19 at hospital presentation. Participants gave a single breath-sample for VOC analysis by GC-IMS. COVID-19 infection was identified by transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT- qPCR) of oral/nasal swabs together with clinical-review. Following correction for environmental contaminants, potential COVID-19 breath-biomarkers were identified by multi-variate analysis and comparison to GC-IMS databases. A COVID-19 breath-score based on the relative abundance of a panel of volatile organic compounds was proposed and tested against the cohort data.

findingsNinety-eight patients were recruited, of whom 21/33 (63.6%) and 10/65 (15.4%) had COVID-19 in Edinburgh and Dortmund, respectively. Other diagnoses included asthma, COPD, bacterial pneumonia, and cardiac conditions. Multivariate analysis identified aldehydes (ethanal, octanal), ketones (acetone, butanone), and methanol that discriminated COVID-19 from other conditions. An unidentified-feature with significant predictive power for severity/death was isolated in Edinburgh, while heptanal was identified in Dortmund. Differentiation of patients with definite diagnosis (25 and 65) of COVID-19 from non-COVID-19 was possible with 80% and 81.5% accuracy in Edinburgh and Dortmund respectively (sensitivity/specificity 82.4%/75%; area-under-the-receiver- operator-characteristic [AUROC] 0.87 95% CI 0.67 to 1) and Dortmund (sensitivity / specificity 90%/80%; AUROC 0.91 95% CI 0.87 to 1).

interpretationThese two studies independently indicate that patients with COVID-19 can be rapidly distinguished from patients with other conditions at first healthcare contact. The identity of the marker compounds is consistent with COVID-19 derangement of breath-biochemistry by ketosis, gastrointestinal effects, and inflammatory processes. Development and validation of this approach may allow rapid diagnosis of COVID-19 in the coming endemic flu seasons.

fundingMR was supported by an NHS Research Scotland Career Researcher Clinician award. DMR was supported by the University of Edinburgh ref COV_29.

Indexed as

AldehydesBreath-analysisBreath-testingCovid-19 diagnosticsGas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometryGC-IMSKetonesMethanolMulti-variate analysis

Identifiers

PMID33134902
PMCPMC7585499
OpenAlexW3084101163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.