Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33134832›Full record

ArticleJNCI cancer spectrum2020

Male Sex and the Risk of Childhood Cancer: The Mediating Effect of Birth Defects.

Erin L Marcotte, Jeremy M Schraw, Tania A Desrosiers, Wendy N Nembhard, Peter H Langlois, Mark A Canfield, Robert E Meyer, Sharon E Plon, Philip J Lupo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Birth Defects in Offspring of Adolescent and Young Adults with a History of Cancer: A Population-Based Study of 27,000 Women.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Erin L MarcotteDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9630-9701
Jeremy M SchrawDepartment of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Tania A DesrosiersDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Wendy N NembhardDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, and Arkansas Children's Research Institute, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Peter H LangloisTexas Department, of State Health Services, Austin, TX, USA.
Mark A CanfieldTexas Department, of State Health Services, Austin, TX, USA.
Robert E MeyerDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Sharon E PlonDepartment of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9626-0936
Philip J LupoDepartment of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0978-5863
Baylor College of Medicine · USTexas Department of State Health Services · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USArkansas Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Tumor BiologyP30CA125123 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Michael M Ittmann · 2007 to 2026
$73.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA125123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a persistent, unexplained disparity in sex ratio among childhood cancer cases, whereby males are more likely to develop most cancers. This male predominance is also seen for most birth defects, which are strongly associated with risk of childhood cancer. We conducted mediation analysis to estimate whether the increased risk of cancer among males is partially explained by birth defect status.

methodsWe used a population-based birth cohort with linked data from birth certificates, birth defects registries, and cancer registries from Arkansas, Michigan, North Carolina, and Texas. We conducted counterfactual mediation analysis to estimate the natural direct and indirect effects of sex on cancer risk, modeling birth defect status as mediator. State; birth year; plurality; and maternal race and ethnicity, age, and education were considered confounders. We conducted separate analyses limited to cancers diagnosed younger than 1 year of age.

resultsOur dataset included 10 181 074 children: 15 110 diagnosed with cancer, 539 567 diagnosed with birth defects, and 2124 co-occurring cases. Birth defect status mediated 38% of the association between sex and cancer overall. The proportion mediated varied by cancer type, including acute myeloid leukemia (93%), neuroblastoma (35%), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (6%). Among children younger than 1 year of age at cancer diagnosis, the proportion mediated was substantially higher (82%).

conclusionsOur results suggest that birth defects mediate a statistically significant proportion of the relationship between sex and childhood cancer. The proportion mediated varied by cancer type and diagnosis age. These findings improve our understanding of the causal pathway underlying male sex as a risk factor for childhood cancer.

Identifiers

PMID33134832
PMCPMC7583156
OpenAlexW3034856625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.