ArticleJNCI cancer spectrum2020
Male Sex and the Risk of Childhood Cancer: The Mediating Effect of Birth Defects.
Article in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Factors Impeding the Timely Pathologic Diagnosis of Malignant Small Round Blue Cell Tumors in a Pediatric Tertiary Care Center in the Philippines: Identifying Opportunities to Optimize Pediatric Cancer Management.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2026Article
- Nationwide trends in childhood cancer incidence and survival in Iran: analysis of national cancer registry data, 2005-2014.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Risk Factors for Oral Mucositis in Pediatric Oncology Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy: A Prospective Cohort.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Article
- Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Pediatric Cancers in Southern Ghana: A Retrospective Observational Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
- The relative contributions of genetic and non-genetic factors to the risk of neuroblastoma.Pediatric investigation · 2025Review
- Evaluating the efficacy and impact of neutropenic diet in pediatric hematology patients: a longitudinal cohort study on adherence, clinical outcomes, and socioeconomic factors.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Cancer risk in individuals with polydactyly: a Swedish population-based cohort study.British journal of cancer · 2024Article
- Birth Defects in Offspring of Adolescent and Young Adults with a History of Cancer: A Population-Based Study of 27,000 Women.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2023Article
- Sex differences in childhood cancer risk among children with major birth defects: a Nordic population-based nested case-control study.International journal of epidemiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Incidence and survival for childhood central nervous system tumours in Australia, 1983-2016.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is a persistent, unexplained disparity in sex ratio among childhood cancer cases, whereby males are more likely to develop most cancers. This male predominance is also seen for most birth defects, which are strongly associated with risk of childhood cancer. We conducted mediation analysis to estimate whether the increased risk of cancer among males is partially explained by birth defect status.
methodsWe used a population-based birth cohort with linked data from birth certificates, birth defects registries, and cancer registries from Arkansas, Michigan, North Carolina, and Texas. We conducted counterfactual mediation analysis to estimate the natural direct and indirect effects of sex on cancer risk, modeling birth defect status as mediator. State; birth year; plurality; and maternal race and ethnicity, age, and education were considered confounders. We conducted separate analyses limited to cancers diagnosed younger than 1 year of age.
resultsOur dataset included 10 181 074 children: 15 110 diagnosed with cancer, 539 567 diagnosed with birth defects, and 2124 co-occurring cases. Birth defect status mediated 38% of the association between sex and cancer overall. The proportion mediated varied by cancer type, including acute myeloid leukemia (93%), neuroblastoma (35%), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (6%). Among children younger than 1 year of age at cancer diagnosis, the proportion mediated was substantially higher (82%).
conclusionsOur results suggest that birth defects mediate a statistically significant proportion of the relationship between sex and childhood cancer. The proportion mediated varied by cancer type and diagnosis age. These findings improve our understanding of the causal pathway underlying male sex as a risk factor for childhood cancer.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.