ArticleAIMS microbiology2020
Article in AIMS microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- HWP1 Gene Sequence Diversity and Antifungal Susceptibility Patterns in Colombian Vulvovaginal Isolates of theInternational journal of microbiology · 2025Article
- Reported prevalence and comparison of diagnostic approaches for Candida africana: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Diagnostic and prognostic research · 2024Review
- Lack of Candida africana in Ugandan pregnant women: results from a pilot study using MALDI-ToF.BMC research notes · 2024Article
- Mechanism and bioinformatics analysis of the effect of berberine-enhanced fluconazole against drug-resistant Candida albicans.BMC microbiology · 2024Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Identification Methods for Pathogenic Yeasts: Challenges and Approaches.Advanced biomedical research · 2023Review
- Molecular discrimination and antifungal susceptibility profile of crypticIranian journal of microbiology · 2022Article
- Article
- Differentiation ofCurrent medical mycology · 2021Article
- Comparison of PCR-RFLP with 21-plex PCR and rDNA Sequencing for Identification of Clinical Yeast Isolates.Mycopathologia · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMATERIALS AND
methodsTotally, 150 pediatric isolates that had previously been identified as
resultsAll 150 isolates included in this study were reconfirmed as
conclusion
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.