Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33134651›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences2019

Effect of PET-MR Inconsistency in the Kernel Image Reconstruction Method.

Daniel Deidda, Nicolas Karakatsanis, Philip M Robson, Nikos Efthimiou, Zahi A Fayad, Robert G Aykroyd, Charalampos Tsoumpas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Standard SPECT myocardial perfusion estimation from half-time acquisitions using deep convolutional residual neural networks.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  9. Improved identification of abdominal aortic aneurysm using the Kernelized Expectation Maximization algorithm.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Comparison of Correction Techniques for the Spill in Effect in Emission Tomography.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel DeiddaBiomedical Imaging Science Department, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (LICAMM), School of Medicine, and the Department of Statistics, School of Mathematics, University of Leeds, UK.
Nicolas KarakatsanisTranslational and Molecular Imaging Institute (TMII), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Radiology, NY, USA; Division of Radio-pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, NY, USA.
Philip M RobsonTranslational and Molecular Imaging Institute (TMII), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Radiology, NY, USA.
Nikos EfthimiouSchool of Life Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Hull, UK.
Zahi A FayadTranslational and Molecular Imaging Institute (TMII), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Radiology, NY, USA.
Robert G AykroydDepartment of Statistics, School of Mathematics, University of Leeds, UK.
Charalampos TsoumpasTranslational and Molecular Imaging Institute (TMII), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Radiology, NY, USA; Biomedical Imaging Science Department, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, UK and with Invicro Ltd., UK.

Funding

MR/PET Imaging of coronary atherosclerosisR01HL071021 · NHLBI · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI FAYAD, ZAHI A. · 2002 to 2019
$7.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL071021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anatomically-driven image reconstruction algorithms have become very popular in positron emission tomography (PET) where they have demonstrated improved image resolution and quantification. This work, consider the effect of spatial inconsistency between MR and PET images in hot and cold regions of the PET image. We investigate these effects on the kernel method from machine learning, in particular, the hybrid kernelized expectation maximization (HKEM). These were applied to Jaszczak phantom and patient data acquired with the Biograph Siemens mMR. The results show that even a small shift can cause a significant change in activity concentration. In general, the PET-MR inconsistencies can induce the partial volume effect, more specifically the 'spill-in' of the affected cold regions and the 'spill-out' from the hot regions. The maximum change was about 100% for the cold region and 10% for the hot lesion using KEM, against the 37% and 8% obtained with HKEM. The findings of this work suggest that including PET information in the kernel enhances the flexibility of the reconstruction in case of spatial inconsistency. Nevertheless, accurate registration and choice of the appropriate MR image for the creation of the kernel is essential to avoid artifacts, blurring, and bias.

Indexed as

anatomically-drivenexpectation maximization (EM)hybrid kernelimage prioriterative reconstructionkernel methodpositron emission tomography (PET)

Identifiers

PMID33134651
PMCPMC7596768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.