ArticleHeliyon2020
RESILIENT: A robust statistical method for estimating multiple VOC sources from limited field measurements.
Article in Heliyon, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Air pollution due to haphazard industrialization has become a major concern in developing countries. Yet, enforcement of related norms remains problematic because violators cannot easily be pinpointed among closely situated industrial units. Accordingly, it has become imperative to equip regulatory authorities with an economical yet accurate tool that quickly locates emission sources and estimates emission rates. Against this backdrop, we propose RESILIENT, a method for Robust Estimation of Source Information from LImited field measuremENTs, which exhibits significant statistical robustness and accuracy even when the data are collected using a low-cost error-prone sensor. In our field experiment, where ground truth was unavailable, the sources estimated to be inactive based on the complete set of measurements were found inactive (up to three decimal places of accuracy) at least 72% of the time even when estimated using just 54% of random measurements. In that setting, rate estimates of active sources were also found to be statistically robust. For direct validation of RESILIENT, we considered a separate public dataset involving 10 tracer experiments, and obtained a significant correlation coefficient of 0.89 between estimated and recorded emission rates, and that of 0.99 between predicted and measured concentration levels at sensor locations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.