Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33134552›Full record

ArticleBiology methods & protocols2020

A lab in the field: applications of real-time,

Adriel Latorre-Pérez, Javier Pascual, Manuel Porcar, Cristina Vilanova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology methods & protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Quantitative metagenomics using a portable protocol.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Synsor: a tool for alignment-free detection of engineered DNA sequences.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Cybergenetic control of microbial community composition.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  12. A Round Trip to the Desert:Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adriel Latorre-PérezDarwin Bioprospecting Excellence SL, Valencia, Spain.
Javier PascualDarwin Bioprospecting Excellence SL, Valencia, Spain.
Manuel PorcarDarwin Bioprospecting Excellence SL, Valencia, Spain.
Cristina VilanovaDarwin Bioprospecting Excellence SL, Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput metagenomic sequencing is considered one of the main technologies fostering the development of microbial ecology. Widely used second-generation sequencers have enabled the analysis of extremely diverse microbial communities, the discovery of novel gene functions, and the comprehension of the metabolic interconnections established among microbial consortia. However, the high cost of the sequencers and the complexity of library preparation and sequencing protocols still hamper the application of metagenomic sequencing in a vast range of real-life applications. In this context, the emergence of portable, third-generation sequencers is becoming a popular alternative for the rapid analysis of microbial communities in particular scenarios, due to their low cost, simplicity of operation, and rapid yield of results. This review discusses the main applications of real-time,

Indexed as

in situ metagenomicsmicrobial ecologythird-generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID33134552
PMCPMC7585387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.