ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2020
Success of minimally invasive salivary gland surgery-Quality of life, prognostic factors.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating YouTube videos on sialendoscopy as an educational resource for patients.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2023Article
- Success of minimally invasive salivary gland surgery-Quality of life, prognostic factors.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveGoal of this study was to investigate, whether sialendoscopy in obstructive salivary gland disorders affects patients' oral health-related quality of life compared to healthy individuals, and to determine factors that might influence this relationship. STUDY
designRetrospective observational study.
settingUniversity of Kiel, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery. SUBJECTS AND
methodsA group of 130 patients, undergoing sialendoscopy between 01/2004 and 06/2017 was considered. Oral health-related quality of life was assessed using the OHIP-G14 (Oral Health Impact Profile) in combination with a custom-made questionnaire on satisfaction and success in relation to sialendoscopy.
resultsOral health-related quality of life of patients without dentures or with removable dentures was significantly worse than in the healthy population, whereas the necessity of multiple additional follow-up treatments was associated with worse oral health-related quality of life. No essential predisposing factors were identified. Average satisfaction with the intervention was observed to be x̅ = 4.33 (SD = 3.69) on a visual analogue scale from 1 (=very satisfied) to 10 (=very unsatisfied). A longer follow-up period and a higher patients' age were positively related, whereas removal of salivary gland during follow-up was negatively related to satisfaction. In 113 cases (86.9%) long-term preservation was accomplished and 115 (88.5%) patients would repeat a sialendoscopy in case needed.
conclusionIn summary, sialendoscopy resulted in long-term high subjective and objective success rates. However, oral health-related quality of life scores did not reach those levels found in the healthy population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.