ArticlePractical laboratory medicine2020
Validation of the newly FDA-approved Buhlmann fCal Turbo assay for measurement of fecal calprotectin in a pediatric population.
Article in Practical laboratory medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Prevalence of Polyketide Synthase-PositiveMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Performance Evaluation of Open Channel Buhlmann Fecal Calprotectin Turbo Assay on Abbott Alinity C Analyzer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Verification of the Bühlmann fCAL turbo faecal calprotectin assay on the Binding Site Optilite benchtop analyser.Practical laboratory medicine · 2023Article
- Changes in Calprotectin (S100A8-A9) and Aldolase in the Saliva of Horses with Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Chicken antibodies are highly suitable for particle enhanced turbidimetric assays.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesInflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is an increasingly prevalent disorder marked by chronic intestinal inflammation. Fecal calprotectin has emerged as a useful biomarker for differential diagnostics and monitoring IBD activity. We validated the newly FDA-approved fCal Turbo fecal calprotectin assay in our pediatric hospital. DESIGN AND
methodsThe performance of the fCal Turbo assay was assessed on the Vitros 5600 analyzer (Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, USA), including limit of quantitation, linearity, precision, and interference studies. Method comparison was performed with 20 fecal samples with the Buhlmann fCal ELISA, and reference range verification was performed with 33 fecal samples.
resultsThe fCal Turbo assay on the Vitros 5600 was linear between 33.1 and 14,182.5 μg/g, with dilution studies extending the range to 33.1-22,000 μg/g, Reproducibility of the assay met acceptability criteria, with intra-assay CV of 0.3-3.2% and inter-assay CV of 5.2-8.9%. Interference studies identified acceptable thresholds for protein, bilirubin, and lipids. We verified a reference range of 33.1-60 μg/g in our patient population. Deming regression identified acceptable correlation with minor positive bias (2.7%) between the fCal Turbo and fCal ELISA methods.
conclusionsThe fCal Turbo assay performs well on the Vitros 5600 analyzer in our patient population, with the assay being easy to use in our routine chemistry workflow. We anticipate that the fCal Turbo assay will be useful as a rapid screening method for differential diagnostics and disease monitoring of IBD in our patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.