Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33134398›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology research2020

Generation of Chicken IgY against SARS-COV-2 Spike Protein and Epitope Mapping.

Yan Lu, Yajun Wang, Zhen Zhang, Jingliang Huang, Meicun Yao, Guobin Huang, Yuanyuan Ge, Peichun Zhang, Huaxin Huang, Yong Wang and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Avian Antibodies as Potential Therapeutic Tools.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yan LuHuamin Medicine Co Ltd., Zhuhai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1328-7050
Yajun WangWolfson Institute for Biomedical Research, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5138-4567
Zhen ZhangJoint Center for Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Jingliang HuangSchool of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3247-0253
Meicun YaoSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Guobin HuangLevi Regenerative Medicine Technologies, Zhuhai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8985-9238
Yuanyuan GeLevi Regenerative Medicine Technologies, Zhuhai, China.
Peichun ZhangHuamin Medicine Co Ltd., Zhuhai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8401-245X
Huaxin HuangHuamin Medicine Co Ltd., Zhuhai, China.
Yong WangGuangzhou Hongxiang Biological Medicine Technology Co Ltd., Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3761-6795
Huiliang LiWolfson Institute for Biomedical Research, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8274-3785
Wen WangHuamin Medicine Co Ltd., Zhuhai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5515-5120
Wolfson Foundation · GBCenter for High Pressure Science & Technology Advanced Research · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNCenter for Life Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This new decade has started with a global pandemic of COVID-19 caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), precipitating a worldwide health crisis and economic downturn. Scientists and clinicians have been racing against time to find therapies for COVID-19. Repurposing approved drugs, developing vaccines and employing passive immunization are three major therapeutic approaches to fighting COVID-19. Chicken immunoglobulin Y (IgY) has the potential to be used as neutralizing antibody against respiratory infections, and its advantages include high avidity, low risk of adverse immune responses, and easy local delivery by intranasal administration. In this study, we raised antibody against the spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV-2 in chickens and extracted IgY (called IgY-S) from egg yolk. IgY-S exhibited high immunoreactivity against SARS-CoV-2 S, and by epitope mapping, we found five linear epitopes of IgY-S in SARS-CoV-2 S, two of which are cross-reactive with SARS-CoV S. Notably, epitope SIIAYTMSL, one of the identified epitopes, partially overlaps the S1/S2 cleavage region in SARS-CoV-2 S and is located on the surface of S trimer in 3D structure, close to the S1/S2 cleavage site. Thus, antibody binding at this location could physically block the access of proteolytic enzymes to S1/S2 cleavage site and thereby impede S1/S2 proteolytic cleavage, which is crucial to subsequent virus-cell membrane fusion and viral cell entry. Therefore, the feasibility of using IgY-S or epitope SIIAYTMS-specific IgY as neutralizing antibody for preventing or treating SARS-CoV-2 infection is worth exploring.

Indexed as

Epitope MappingAdministration, IntranasalAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBetacoronavirusChickensCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19COVID-19 SerotherapyCross ReactionsFeasibility StudiesHumansImmunization, PassiveImmunoglobulinsPandemicsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralIgYImmunoglobulinsSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33134398
PMCPMC7568776
OpenAlexW3093010833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.