Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33134236›Full record

Observational studyFrontiers in public health2020

Evaluation of 1-Year in-Home Monitoring Technology by Home-Dwelling Older Adults, Family Caregivers, and Nurses.

Bruno Pais, Philipp Buluschek, Guillaume DuPasquier, Tobias Nef, Narayan Schütz, Hugo Saner, Daniel Gatica-Perez, Valérie Santschi

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Frontiers in public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. eHealth profile of patients with diabetes.Frontiers in public health · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Family informatics.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bruno PaisLa Source, School of Nursing Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Philipp BuluschekDomoSafety SA, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Guillaume DuPasquierDomoSafety SA, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Tobias NefARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Narayan SchützARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Hugo SanerARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Daniel Gatica-PerezIdiap Research Institute, Martigny, Switzerland.
Valérie SantschiLa Source, School of Nursing Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland.
University of Bern · CHHES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland · CHIdiap Research Institute · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

FrailtyHome Care ServicesAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversHumansQuality of LifeTechnologygerontechnologyhome caremonitoring technologiesolder peoplepatient satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID33134236
PMCPMC7562920
OpenAlexW3090506614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.