Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33134130›Full record

ArticleJournal of traditional and complementary medicine2020

Biochemical, hematological and histopathological evaluation of the toxicity potential of the leaf extract of

Oladotun A Olayode, Michael Oluwatoyin Daniyan, Gbola Olayiwola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of traditional and complementary medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Unlocking the Therapeutic Potential ofMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evaluation of acute and sub-acute toxicity ofResearch in pharmaceutical sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Antidiabetic Potential ofScientifica · 2025
    Article
  10. Toxicity Profile ofBiochemistry research international · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Oladotun A OlayodeDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria.
Michael Oluwatoyin DaniyanDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria.
Gbola OlayiwolaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimThe many pharmacological potentials of EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE: Acute and repeated dose studies were conducted in male and female groups of rats (135-150 g), using OECD 423 and 407 Tests guidelines respectively. Functional observational battery, and body weights were monitored. Blood samples were analysed for haematological and plasma biochemical indices. Organs (brain, kidneys and liver) specimen were collected and weighed. Kidney and liver specimen were subjected to histopathological analysis. RESULTS AND

conclusionThe LD

Indexed as

Acute toxicityOrganotoxicityRepeated dose toxicitySafety assessmentStachytarpheta cayennesis

Identifiers

PMID33134130
PMCPMC7588336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.