ArticleMethodsX2020
Direct ENIT: An easy and reliable tool for gRNA efficacy verification by tracking induced chromosomal translocation.
Article in MethodsX, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Influence of Cohesin on the Short-Scale Dynamics of Intact and Damaged Chromatin in Different Phases of the Cell Cycle.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CRISPR/Cas systems (Clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats / CRISPR-associated) are rapidly becoming a commonplace and popular tool for gene editing in research and clinical contexts. However, the quality of CRISPR/Cas experiments depends heavily on the guide RNA (gRNA) design; therefore, a reliable, easy, and rapid method for verifying gRNA cleavage efficacy is necessary. Engineered nuclease-induced translocations (ENIT) are an easy and cost-efficient method for the verification of gRNA efficacy, which involves tracking induced chromosomal mutations, using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). We have customized this method using both direct PCR and nested PCR approaches and have been able to reduce the sample preparation time. We present a simple and reliable gRNA testing approach that requires no specific enzymes or equipment.•The approach requires only routinely used enzymes and equipment.•Cost- and time-efficient, requiring approximately 30 min for PCR sample preparation, without requiring DNA purification.•High sensitivity, with induced translocation detected in 100 of 10,000 cells in the general population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.