ArticleMethodsX2020
Refinement of the zebrafish embryo developmental toxicity assay.
Article in MethodsX, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unravelling the developmental toxicity of heavy metals using zebrafish as a model: a narrative review.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2025Review
- Assessing developmental toxicity and non-CYP mediated biotransformation of two anti-epileptics and their human metabolites in zebrafish embryos and larvae.Current research in toxicology · 2024Article
- Article
- Developmental Toxicity and Biotransformation of Two Anti-Epileptics in Zebrafish Embryos and Early Larvae.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- DMSO Concentrations up to 1% are Safe to be Used in the Zebrafish Embryo Developmental Toxicity Assay.Frontiers in toxicology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Several pharmaceutical and chemical companies are using the zebrafish embryo as an alternative to animal testing for early detection of developmental toxicants. Unfortunately, the protocol of this zebrafish embryo assay varies between labs, resulting in discordant data for identical compounds. The assay also has some limitations, such as low biotransformation capacity and fewer morphological endpoints in comparison with the in vivo mammalian developmental toxicity studies. Consequently, there is a need to standardize and further optimize the assay for developmental toxicity testing. We developed a Zebrafish Embryo Developmental Toxicity Assay (ZEDTA) that can be extended with a metabolic activation system and/or skeletal staining to increase its sensitivity. As such, the ZEDTA can be used as a modular system depending on the compound of interest.•Our protocol is customized with a metabolic activation system for test compounds, using human liver microsomes. This system ensures exposure of zebrafish embryos to metabolites that are relevant for human risk and safety assessment. As human liver microsomes are toxic for the zebrafish embryo, we developed a preincubation system with an ultracentrifugation and subsequent dilution step.•Additionally, we developed a skeletal staining protocol that can be added to the ZEDTA modular system. Our live Alizarin Red staining method detects several bone structures in 5-day old zebrafish larvae in a consistent manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.