Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33134043›Full record

ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research

Paramedian forehead flap reconstruction for skin tumors involving central subunit of face: An analysis of 37 cases.

Shiv Rajan, Naseem Akhtar, Vijay Kumar, Sameer Gupta, Sanjeev Misra, Arun Chaturvedi, Shashank Chaudhary, Parijat Suryavanshi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shiv RajanDepartment of Surgical Oncology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, UP, India.
Naseem AkhtarDepartment of Surgical Oncology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, UP, India.
Vijay KumarDepartment of Surgical Oncology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, UP, India.
Sameer GuptaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, UP, India.
Sanjeev MisraAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Arun ChaturvediDepartment of Surgical Oncology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, UP, India.
Shashank ChaudharyDepartment of Surgical Oncology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, UP, India.
Parijat SuryavanshiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, UP, India.
King George's Medical University · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTumors of facial skin are common in upper part of central subunit of face. Defects after resection require a flap, which is pliable, thin, and has a good colour match. Among the various local flaps available paramedian forehead flap is a good option. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients reconstructed with paramedian forehead flap during the period from January 2015 to March 2020 were included in the study. Data regarding the demographic, clinical characteristics, and treatment details was recorded, and analyzed for postoperative complications and cosmetic outcomes.

resultsParamedian forehead flap reconstruction was performed in 37 patients who were resected for tumor involving upper central subunit of face. Median age of patients was 57 years. Male to female ratio was 1.4:1. All tumors were resected with a negative margin. Nodal disease was managed by superficial parotidectomy only (4/37), superficial parotidectomy along with supra-omohyoid neck dissection (6/37) and modified neck dissection (1/37). In five patients additional buccal mucosa graft was used to reconstruct conjunctiva. Additional flaps were required in two patients in whom nasolabial and mustarde flaps were used. Partial flap loss occurred in one patient. There was no major flap loss. Surgical site infection developed in only one patient, who had partial flap loss. On subjective assessment, nearly 60% patients described their appearance as good.

conclusionFacial reconstruction in area of dorsum of nose and medial aspect of both eyelids using paramedian forehead flaps is a simple and quick procedure.

Indexed as

EyelidForehead flapLocal flapNosePostoperative outcome

Identifiers

PMID33134043
PMCPMC7585945
OpenAlexW3093586866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.