ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2020
Outpatient Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Outcomes Following Profunda Artery Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Avoiding Chest Wall Morbidity in Outpatient Microvascular Free-Flap Breast Reconstruction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Approach to DIEP Flap Pedicle Dissection via a Midline Fascial Incision.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- Moving the needle: a narrative review of enhanced recovery protocols in breast reconstruction.Annals of translational medicine · 2023Review
- Influence of Closed-incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Abdominal Site Complications in Autologous Breast Reconstruction.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2023Article
- Decreasing length of stay in breast reconstruction patients: A national analysis of 2019-2020.Journal of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- Postoperative Day 1 Discharge in Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2023Article
- Trends and Innovations in Autologous Breast Reconstruction.Archives of plastic surgery · 2023Article
- Updates on Enhanced Recovery after Surgery protocols for plastic surgery of the breast and future directions.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2023Article
- Bilateral Outpatient Breast Reconstruction with Stacked DIEP and Vertical PAP Flaps.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe extensive nature of perforator-based breast reconstructions, combined with the need for postoperative flap monitoring, often leads to long hospitalizations. We present an early report demonstrating the feasibility and advantages of a modified operative technique and recovery protocol, allowing us to perform outpatient breast reconstructions with the DIEP flap. This follow-up comprises the experience gained, which is expanded to other perforator-based flaps and not limited to DIEP breast reconstructions.
methodsWe have implemented a general protocol in patients undergoing breast reconstruction with autologous flaps, promoting early mobilization and discharge by improving postoperative pain and decreasing opioid requirements. This protocol includes intraoperative local anesthesia, a microfascial incision for DIEP harvest with rib preservation, along with prophylactic anticoagulation.
resultsNinety-two consecutive patients underwent autologous tissue-based breast reconstruction with DIEP, IGAP, and PAP flaps. No intraoperative complications were reported. All patients were discharged within 23 hours, without evidence of flap compromise. One patient required operative takeback for evacuation of a hematoma on postoperative day 4. No partial or total flap losses were documented. The aim of any procedure should be to get to the patient back to the preoperative status as quickly as possible, as prolonged hospitalizations are associated with higher incidences of infection, deep venous thrombosis, overall dissatisfaction, and higher overall costs of care.
conclusionsBy using a modified operative technique, multimodal pain control, and postoperative anticoagulant therapy, outpatient perforator-flap-based breast reconstructions can be performed with high success and low complication rates.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.