ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2020
Outcomes and Complications of the Mustardé Otoplasty: A "Good-Fast-Cheap" Technique for the Prominent Ear Deformity.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quality of Life After Mustardé Otoplasty for Prominent Ears.Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of Mustardé, Fascioperichondrial Flap, and Combined Otoplasty Techniques: Clinical Outcomes and Recurrence Rates in 365 Patients.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Otoplasty in Saudi Arabia: Is There a Change in Demographic Trend?Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- A New Guiding Suturing Technique for Reshaping of the Antihelix in Patients with Prominent Ears.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Article
- Bat Ear Correction Steps and Outcomes for Better Life Support.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024Article
- Complications of Cartilage Sparing Otoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The Journal of craniofacial surgery · 2024Article
- Bilateral Keloid Formation after Otoplasty in the Presence of Prolonged Mask Wearing.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2023Article
- Benefits of Combined Surgical Techniques in Otoplasty.The Eurasian journal of medicine · 2022Article
- Complication Rates From Otoplasty at a Tertiary Facial Plastic Surgery Center: A Retrospective Analysis.The Journal of craniofacial surgery · 2022Article
- Performance-optimized otoplasty.BMC surgery · 2022Article
- Modified bilateral fasciaperichondrial flap for prominent ear correction.Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Mustardé otoplasty is a commonly used procedure for the correction of the prominent ear deformity. Complication rates related to suture extrusion and long-term outcomes are variable in the literature. The study's purpose was to examine the efficacy and safety of the Mustardé otoplasty and its resource utilization, using an "iron triangle" methodology incorporating quality, time, and cost.
methodsRetrospective data were collected on patients under 18 years who underwent primary Mustardé otoplasty between 2009 and 2018. Patient demographics, intraoperative details, complications, follow-up, and satisfaction were collected and analyzed.
resultsThere were 119 Mustardé otoplasties performed on 68 patients, with a median follow-up of 72 weeks (24-476 weeks). In total, 51 of the 68 patients underwent bilateral procedures. The median operative time was 95 minutes (31-133 minutes), translating to a facility case cost of $2046. A total of 24 complications were reported in 17 patients. Minor complications included the following: suture extrusion (n = 20), hematoma (n = 1), and suture abscess (n = 1). Major complications included reoperation (n = 2). The series had a revision rate of 1.7% (n = 2). No additional procedures were documented at other hospitals in the province. The majority (97%) of ear outcomes demonstrated both patient and surgeon satisfaction.
conclusionsThe Mustardé otoplasty demonstrated a high efficacy in the correction of the prominent ear, with low reoperation rates and high patient and surgeon satisfaction. The procedure demonstrated intriguing results in resource utilization, with brief operative times, a "knife and fork" supply chain, and minimal overall case costs. This technique qualifies as a good, fast, and cheap outpatient otoplasty option.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.