Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33133935›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2020

Anaphylactic Reaction to Lymphazurin 1% during Breast Reconstruction Surgery: An Uncommon but Serious Complication.

Vikram Krishna, Corbin Muetterties, Maggie L DiNome, Charles Y Tseng

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 76% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vikram KrishnaDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif.
Corbin MuettertiesDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif.
Maggie L DiNomeDivision of General Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif.
Charles Y TsengDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif.
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lymphazurin 1% (isosulfan blue dye) is the most frequently used blue dye in the United States, and it is commonly used for sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer patients. Although cases of allergic reaction to lymphazurin have been reported in the general surgery literature, to our knowledge, no cases of an adverse reaction to isosulfan blue have been reported in the plastic surgery literature. We describe a case of an intraoperative biphasic anaphylactic reaction to isosulfan blue in a female patient undergoing bilateral mastectomy and immediate bilateral DIEP breast reconstruction. The severity of her anaphylactic reaction required that we stop flap dissection and abort the reconstruction. Although an allergic reaction is uncommon, recognizing the signs of an acute hypersensitivity reaction is critical to good outcomes in these situations. Given the volume of combined breast oncologic and breast reconstruction surgeries and the increasing number of vascularized lymph node transfer and lymphovenous anastomosis performed annually, it is essential for the plastic surgeon to be cognizant of this rare hypersensitivity reaction.

Identifiers

PMID33133935
PMCPMC7544393
OpenAlexW3097948822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.