ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2020
New Simple Technique for Syndactyly Release.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term patient reported outcomes and quality of life after syndactyly separation.The Journal of hand surgery, European volume · 2026Article
- A new concept of webspace reconstruction in syndactyly - An easily reproducible cross-shaped advancement flap.Journal of hand and microsurgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Can good functional and cosmetic result be achieved in syndactyly separation using a straight midline incision with a hexagonal dorsal skin flap?
methodsWe performed 39 web reconstructions at a median of 20 months of age (11-43 months) to 26 consecutive children (21 male) with 30 simple, 4 complex, and 5 complicated syndactylies. Eighteen of the simple syndactylies were incomplete, ending at the proximal interphalangeal joint in 15 and at the distal interphalangeal joint in 3. Inguinal skin grafts were used in 2 children with either complex or complicated syndactyly. Operation time was recorded. Complications were registered. Height of the new web spaces was calculated. Parents' satisfaction on both functional and cosmetic outcome was assessed using a Visual Analog Scale from 0 to 100.
resultsDuration of one web reconstruction ranged from 50 to 95 minutes in simple incomplete, 56 to 135 in simple complete, 116 to 151 in complex, and 72 to 123 in complicated syndactylies. One child had a self-induced bilateral postoperative infection that lead to web creep. Two patients developed hypertrophic scars, which responded well to silicone treatment. Mean cosmetic and functional Visual Analog Scale scores were 87 (45-100) and 92 (63-100), respectively, at a mean follow-up of 1.3 years (range, 0.5-3.7).
conclusionWeb reconstruction using a hexagonal dorsal skin flap and straight midline incisions with closure at mid-lateral lines is safe, with good cosmetic and functional outcome in our short-term follow-up.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.