ArticleCureus2020
Reoperations After Cataract Surgery: Is the Incidence Predictable Through a Risk Factor Stratification System?
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Topical and subconjunctival anesthesia versus topical anesthesia alone in patients with senile cataracts undergoing phacoemulsification: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Trial
- When should cataract surgeons seek assistance from experienced colleagues?International ophthalmology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction The objective of the study was to quantify the number of procedures needed to achieve the best possible surgical outcome, depending on the number and type of risk factors identified. Methods Two independent observers reviewed the medical records of 1,502 patients who underwent phacoemulsification surgery, during a two-year period (January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2015). Preoperative risk factors were documented according to the stratification system used. Based on the total risk score, each case was allocated to one of four risk groups with 0, 1-2, 3-5, and >6 total risk factors, respectively. All qualitative and quantitative characteristics were gathered and included in a multivariate analysis. Results A total of 1,792 eyes were included. Αge over 88 years, low cooperation ability with the patient, and surgeries performed by residents tended to have more often complications, while white/intumescent cataract, iridodonesis/phacodonesis, α1 blockers intake, and male gender are risk factors positively associated with more than one surgery. Conclusions Risk factors tend to be prognostic for possible intraoperative complications. The number of procedures needed for the best possible surgical outcome seems to depend on these preoperative risk factors. A stratification method increases the level of awareness of the surgeon, and therefore may decrease the number of complications and even procedures while enhancing the "safe" practice and skills of residents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.