Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33133835›Full record

ArticleCureus2020

The Hidden Work of Urology Residents - A Cross-Sectional Study.

Zehra Kazmi, Kaleem Khan, M Hammad Ather

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 86% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zehra KazmiSection of Urology, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, PAK.
Kaleem KhanSection of Urology, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, PAK.
M Hammad AtherSection of Urology, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, PAK.
Aga Khan University · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn a tertiary care hospital that caters to all kinds of patients in the clinical and emergency setting, consultation is an important service provided by the urology team. Profiling the spectrum of urologic disease encountered by trainees will assist in the planning of residency curricula and is bound to improve patient outcome for procedural education.

methodsAll urologic consultation requests received over a period of three months (November 22, 2019, to February 22, 2020) were identified and recorded in a prospectively maintained consult log. Information collected for each encounter included the time, date, reason for consult, primary service and diagnosis along with the final urologic diagnosis, any urologic intervention, and basic patient demographics (gender and age).

resultsOver three months, a total of 568 consult requests were reviewed. Of the patients consulted for, 74% were males; the mean age was 58.45 years (SD+/-19.5 years). The most common service seeking urology consult was the Emergency Room (n=240, 42.25%). The most common reason for consultation was hematuria (n=103, 18.13%) followed by obstructive uropathy (n=98, 17.25%). The majority (n=147, 26%) of the calls were placed between mid-day and 4 pm. Of the total, 26% required immediate attention. Urologic intervention was required in 226 (39.8%). The number of consults seen by junior team members was 478 (84.14%).

conclusionHematuria and obstructive uropathy are the most common reasons for urologic consultation requests. Nearly two-thirds of the consults either required immediate attention or intervention. Most of the consults were seen by junior residents, who required elaborate training to address these common issues independently. We believe that our results will be helpful in developing a curriculum for training junior residents.

Indexed as

consultatione-consultreferralsurology consultsurology department

Identifiers

PMID33133835
PMCPMC7586419
OpenAlexW3089320005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.