Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33133782›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2020

Chemical patterns of colony membership and mother-offspring similarity in Antarctic fur seals are reproducible.

Jonas Tebbe, Emily Humble, Martin Adam Stoffel, Lisa Johanna Tewes, Caroline Müller, Jaume Forcada, Barbara Caspers, Joseph Ivan Hoffman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jonas TebbeDepartment of Animal Behaviour, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Emily HumbleDepartment of Animal Behaviour, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6841-1269
Martin Adam StoffelDepartment of Animal Behaviour, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4030-3543
Lisa Johanna TewesDepartment of Chemical Ecology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Caroline MüllerDepartment of Chemical Ecology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8447-534X
Jaume ForcadaBritish Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2115-0150
Barbara CaspersDepartment of Behavioural Ecology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Joseph Ivan HoffmanDepartment of Animal Behaviour, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5895-8949
Bielefeld University · DEBritish Antarctic Survey · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Replication studies are essential for evaluating the validity of previous research findings. However, it has proven challenging to reproduce the results of ecological and evolutionary studies, partly because of the complexity and lability of many of the phenomena being investigated, but also due to small sample sizes, low statistical power and publication bias. Additionally, replication is often considered too difficult in field settings where many factors are beyond the investigator's control and where spatial and temporal dependencies may be strong. We investigated the feasibility of reproducing original research findings in the field of chemical ecology by performing an exact replication of a previous study of Antarctic fur seals (

Indexed as

Chemical fingerprintExact replication studyFur sealGas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS)Mother-offspring similarityOdour profileOlfactory communicationPinnipedReproducible scienceWild population

Identifiers

PMID33133782
PMCPMC7580581
OpenAlexW3094057355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.