ReviewCentral European journal of urology2020
Modern biomarkers in prostate cancer diagnosis.
Review in Central European journal of urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Electrochemical Biosensors for Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis Using Protein Biomarkers: Current Trends, Advances, and Clinical Translation Potential.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Personalized Boolean network dynamic profiling and machine learning approaches to identify combinatorial treatments for prostate cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Biomarkers in Localized Prostate Cancer: From Diagnosis to Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- PTEN and ERG Biomarkers as Predictors of Biochemical Recurrence Risk in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Understanding Racial Disparities in Prostate Cancer: A Multifaceted Approach.Cancer medicine · 2025Review
- Analysing DNA methylation and transcriptomic signatures to predict prostate cancer recurrence risk.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Towards robust medical machine olfaction: Debiasing GC-MS data enhances prostate cancer diagnosis from urine volatiles.PloS one · 2025Article
- The diagnostic value of prostate health index combined with soluble e-cadherin for prostate cancer.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Integrating molecular diagnostics for early prostate cancer detection.Oncoscience · 2025Article
- Prediction of bone metastasis of prostate cancer based on intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics of MRI T2WI combined with ADC images.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Components of the Endosome-Lysosome Vesicular Machinery as Drivers of the Metastatic Cascade in Prostate Cancer.Cancers · 2024Review
- Prostate Cancer: A Review of Genetics, Current Biomarkers and Personalised Treatments.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Review
- Revisiting HER2 in Prostate Cancer from an Inclusive Perspective: From Biomarkers to Omics.Cancers · 2024Review
- Integrating Proteomic Analysis and Machine Learning to Predict Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness.Stats · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Review
- Gene methylation status in focus of advanced prostate cancer diagnostics and improved individual outcomes.Translational andrology and urology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe most common malignant neoplasm of the urinary tract is prostate cancer (PCa), which is a heterogeneous disease, ranging from very slowly developing and slightly benign to progressing, aggressive, metastatic and fatal, even when properly treated. Existing, imperfect diagnostic methods often lead to over-diagnosis and over-treatment of PCa. That is why new, better PCa biomarkers are being developed. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis review summarizes the current results of the most promising and clinically used PCa biomarkers, as well as having the potential to create new diagnostic and prognostic tools, based on the Web of Science (www.apps.webofknowledge.com) and Scopus (www.scopus) databases. com).
resultsLimited specificity of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test brings a need to develop new and better diagnostic tools. In the last few years, new approaches for providing significantly better biomarkers, an alternative to PSA, have been introduced. Modern biomarkers show improvement in being used as not only a diagnostic procedure, but also for staging, evaluating aggressiveness and managing the therapeutic process. We describe the methods recommended in the diagnosis of PCa and new PCa molecular diagnostics technologies. Individual biomarkers are used in various stages of the PCa diagnostic process, which was presented on the developed diagnostic flowchart describing the role of biomarkers in prostate cancer management.
conclusionsGiven the diverse nature of PCa, one diagnostic test will not answer all questions, so the use of several diagnostic methods will allow physicians to provide patients with better, personalized clinical advice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.