Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33133649›Full record

ArticleCentral European journal of urology2020

How has the COVID-19 pandemic impacted Polish urologists? Results from a national survey.

Pawel Rajwa, Mikołaj Przydacz, Piotr Zapała, Gniewko Wieckiewicz, Jakub Ryszawy, Dominik Chorągwicki, Rafał B Drobot, Piotr Radziszewski, Andrzej Paradysz, Piotr L Chłosta

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Central European journal of urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A complete year of urology residency training under COVID-19: impact on education and health.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pawel RajwaDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland.
Mikołaj PrzydaczDepartment of Urology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland.
Piotr ZapałaDepartment of General, Oncological and Functional Oncology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Gniewko WieckiewiczChair and Clinical Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Jakub RyszawyDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland.
Dominik ChorągwickiDepartment of Urology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland.
Rafał B DrobotDepartment of Urology and Urological Oncology, Multidisciplinary Hospital in Warsaw-Międzylesie, Warsaw, Poland.
Piotr RadziszewskiDepartment of General, Oncological and Functional Oncology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Andrzej ParadyszDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland.
Piotr L ChłostaDepartment of Urology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland.
Medical University of Silesia · PLJagiellonian University · PLMedical University of Warsaw · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPoland was initially less affected by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, however, severe restrictions, and health care restructuration have impacted all areas of medicine, including urology. Therefore, we aimed, via an online survey, to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Polish urologists and urology residents. MATERIAL AND

methodsBetween May 15 and June 6, 2020, 229 (28.63% response rate) urologists and urology residents responded to a 28-question online survey. The questionnaire analyzed basic demographic and professional characteristics, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on physicians' everyday work, mental status as well as private life. We further compared the differences between the selected subgroups.

resultsNearly all (96.5%) responders claimed that the pandemic had a moderate to high impact on their everyday clinical practice with the majority of the residents (62.0%) believing that the COVID-19 pandemic will harm their training. Most responders (86.9%) reported over 25% declines in outpatient clinic consultations and 55.9% claimed that their income dropped over 25%. Only 38.9% wanted telemedicine to permanently replace some of the consultations after the pandemic, with residents being significantly more positive about this modality (51.4% vs. 33.1%; p = 0.01). Interestingly, 79.9% noticed the negative psychological effect of the pandemic on their colleagues, and 57.6% felt increased anxiety, sadness, or stress.

conclusionsThis study revealed the complaints and needs of Polish urologists and urology residents after the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. There was a significantly negative impact on their work, mental health, and private life.

Indexed as

COVID-19Polandresidentsurveyurology

Identifiers

PMID33133649
PMCPMC7587496
OpenAlexW3092543215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.