ReviewCardiac failure review2020
Determinants of Functional Capacity and Quality of Life After Implantation of a Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device.
Review in Cardiac failure review, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- From Continuous-Flow Mechanical Circulatory Support to Heart Transplantation: Hemodynamic, Immunometabolic, and Body Composition Determinants of Rehabilitation Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Functional Status of Patients with Long-Term Mechanical Left Ventricular Assist Device Support in Relation to Physical Activity.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Hybrid cardiac rehabilitation in patients with durable left ventricular assist devices: the REHAB-ASSIST study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Exercise and cardiac rehabilitation after LVAD implantation.Heart failure reviews · 2025Review
- The experience of bodily image for patients with left ventricular assist device.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Iron Deficiency in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices.Cardiac failure review · 2024Review
- [Cardiac rehabilitation in LVAD patients : Aspects regarding exercise and rhythm].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2023Review
- Why Do so Few People with Heart Failure Receive Cardiac Rehabilitation?Cardiac failure review · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are increasingly used as destination therapy in patients with end-stage heart failure and, with recent improvements in pump design, adverse event rates are decreasing. Implanted patients experience improved survival, quality of life (QoL) and functional capacity (FC). However, improvement in FC and QoL after implantation is not unequivocal, and this has implications for patient selection and preimplantation discussions with patients and relatives. This article identifies preimplantation predictors of lack of improvement in FC and QoL after continuous-flow LVAD implantation and discusses potential mechanisms, allowing for the identification of potential factors that can be modified. In particular, the pathophysiology behind insufficient improvement in peak oxygen uptake is discussed. Data are included from 40 studies, resulting in analysis of >700 exercise tests. Mean peak oxygen uptake was 13.4 ml/kg/min (equivalent to 48% of predicted value; 259 days after implantation, range 31-1,017 days) and mean 6-minute walk test distance was 370 m (182 days after implantation, range 43-543 days). Finally, the interplay between improvement in FC and QoL is discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.