Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33133640›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience of consciousness2020

Event-related potentials reflect prediction errors and pop-out during comprehension of degraded speech.

Leah Banellis, Rodika Sokoliuk, Conor J Wild, Howard Bowman, Damian Cruse

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience of consciousness, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Leah BanellisSchool of Psychology and Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT, UK.
Rodika SokoliukSchool of Psychology and Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT, UK.
Conor J WildBrain and Mind Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada.
Howard BowmanSchool of Psychology and Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT, UK.
Damian CruseSchool of Psychology and Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT, UK.
University of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Kent · GBWestern University · CA

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P013228/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comprehension of degraded speech requires higher-order expectations informed by prior knowledge. Accurate top-down expectations of incoming degraded speech cause a subjective semantic 'pop-out' or conscious breakthrough experience. Indeed, the same stimulus can be perceived as meaningless when no expectations are made in advance. We investigated the event-related potential (ERP) correlates of these top-down expectations, their error signals and the subjective pop-out experience in healthy participants. We manipulated expectations in a word-pair priming degraded (noise-vocoded) speech task and investigated the role of top-down expectation with a between-groups attention manipulation. Consistent with the role of expectations in comprehension, repetition priming significantly enhanced perceptual intelligibility of the noise-vocoded degraded targets for attentive participants. An early ERP was larger for mismatched (i.e. unexpected) targets than matched targets, indicative of an initial error signal not reliant on top-down expectations. Subsequently, a P3a-like ERP was larger to matched targets than mismatched targets only for attending participants-i.e. a pop-out effect-while a later ERP was larger for mismatched targets and did not significantly interact with attention. Rather than relying on complex

Indexed as

conscious pop-outglobal neuronal workspace breakthroughprediction error minimization

Identifiers

PMID33133640
PMCPMC7585676
OpenAlexW3094511876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.