ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2020
Comparison of Bone Preservation in Elderly Patients with Femoral Neck Fracture After Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty Using Shorter Femoral Stem and Standard Femoral Stem.
Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- What patient reported outcome measures are used in clinical trials in hip fracture? A systematic mapping review.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Arthroplasties for hip fracture in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Do Cementless Short Tapered Stems Reduce the Incidence of Thigh Pain After Hip Arthroplasty? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of Korean medical science · 2022Pooled it
- Surgical interventions for treating intracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Calcar-guided short-stem total hip arthroplasty: Will it be the future standard? Review and perspectives.World journal of orthopedics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis randomized control study was designed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes, including periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) changes, between the short and standard stems after using cementless hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients with femur neck fractures. MATERIALS AND
methodsFrom January 2013 to May 2017, 151 patients (aged ≥ 65 years) underwent hemiarthroplasties due to femoral neck fractures. Patients were randomized into two groups; 77 patients in Group A implanting the short femoral stem and 74 patients in Group B implanting the standard femoral stem. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed in all patients.
results75 patients (40 patients in Group A and 35 patients in Group B) completed routine follow-up for a minimum of 2 years. The clinical outcomes, including ambulatory functions and thigh pain, were similar in both groups. All the femoral stems acquired radiologic stability. At postoperative one year, BMD values in Gruen zone (G) seven on the standard stem side were significantly lower than those on the short stem side (
conclusionsBoth the clinical outcomes and radiologic stability in both group demonstrated similar results in elderly patients with femoral neck fracture at the latest follow-up. In addition, the periprosthetic BMD of the short femoral stems demonstrated better periprosthetic bone preservation at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCES: Therapeutic Level II.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.