ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2020
Total Hip Arthroplasty Digital Templating: Size Predicting Ability and Interobserver Variability.
Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Preoperative digital design in artificial total hip arthroplasty for patients with Crowe type III and IV developmental dysplasia of the hip: A case series.The Journal of international medical research · 2025Article
- Does two dimensional templating allow for the use of reduced-size ancillaries in total hip arthroplasty?International orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Accuracy of two-dimensional digital planning in uncemented primary hip arthroplasty: monocentric analysis of eight hundred implants.International orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Surgeon's Experience and Accuracy of Preoperative Digital Templating in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.Hip & pelvis · 2024Article
- Comparison of three-versus two-dimensional pre-operative planning for total hip arthroplasty.Journal of orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Accuracy analysis of artificial intelligence-assisted three-dimensional preoperative planning in total hip replacement.Joint diseases and related surgery · 2023Article
- Short-term outcome of artificial intelligence-assisted preoperative three-dimensional planning of total hip arthroplasty for developmental dysplasia of the hip compared to traditional surgery.Joint diseases and related surgery · 2023Article
- A Study Investigating Whether BMI Is Associated With Acetabular Bone Size: Big Bones or a Big Myth?Cureus · 2021Article
- The accuracy and reliability of preoperative digital 2D templating in prosthesis size prediction in uncemented versus cemented total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EFORT open reviews · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDuring the last century, total hip arthroplasties have become more popular. They have had a huge impact on the quality of life, pain, range of motion, social interaction, and psychological well-being. A number of studies have emphasized the importance of using templates to choose the appropriate implant size when planning the surgery. Our aim is to use MediCad MATERIALS AND
methodsAn arthroplasty preoperative plan was created according to the MediCad
resultsThe median size accuracy was 0.7 (range: 0.27-0.87) for the cup, 0.73 (range: 0.36-0.83) for the stem, and 0.28 (range: -0.14-0.69) for the neck. Interobserver reliability was good (kappa > 0.4) and stronger when measuring the stem than when doing so with the cup. Conclusion: Digital preoperative total hip arthroplasty planning is a good method for predicting component size, restoring hip anatomy (vertical offset and horizontal offset), with good interobserver reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.