ReviewMethodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal
The Role of National Registries in Improving Quality of Care and Outcomes for Cardiovascular Disease.
Review in Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Harnessing Big Data, Smart and Digital Technologies and Artificial Intelligence for Preventing, Early Intercepting, Managing, and Treating Psoriatic Arthritis: Insights From a Systematic Review of the Literature.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Pooled it
- Building a type 1 diabetes registry in South Africa: Insights from a national multi-stakeholder workshop.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2026Article
- Vascular Disease Prospective-Retrospective Observational Registry for Aortic Aneurysm and Peripheral Artery Disease in Korea: Study Rationale and Methodology.Vascular specialist international · 2026Article
- Emerging Pharmacological Strategies for Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Qualitative Analysis of Interventional Clinical Trials Registered on ClinicalTrials.Gov.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Building Real-World Evidence Infrastructure to Improve Health and Healthcare in the United States: Part I-Coordinated Registry Networks and Systemic Coordinated Inter-Organizational Networks.International journal of translational medical research and public health · 2025Article
- Automated calculation of healthcare quality and safety indicators for head and neck cancers: a multicentric study using electronic health records.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Improving Cardiovascular Quality Through Real-Time Data and Provider Engagement.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- The Big Data Era in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: Advanced Analytics for Truly Personalized Care.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The ImageGuideEcho Registry: Using Data Science to Understand and Improve Echocardiography.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Designing a Software for Registry of Pregnant Women with Heart Disease in Iran and Preliminary Results.Journal of medical signals and sensors · 2025Article
- Health Data Sciences and Cardiovascular Disease in Africa: Needs and the Way Forward.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2024Review
- Design and rationale of the Engage-HF study: the impact of a gamified engagement toolkit on participation and engagement in a heart failure registry.European heart journal. Digital health · 2024Article
- Houston Methodist cardiovascular learning health system (CVD-LHS) registry: Methods for development and implementation of an automated electronic medical record-based registry using an informatics framework approach.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2024Article
- Building a patient-centred nationwide integrated cardiac care registry: intermediate results from the Netherlands.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2024Review
- Assessing and Improving the Care of Patients With Heart Failure in Ghana: Protocol for a Prospective Observational Study and the Ghana Heart Initiative-Heart Failure Registry.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Article
- Data quality and auditing within the Netherlands Heart Registration: using the PCI registry as an example.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2023Article
- GENERATOR HEART FAILURE DataMart: An integrated framework for heart failure research.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Using real-world data to monitor and improve quality of care in coronary artery disease: results from the Netherlands Heart Registration.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2022Review
- The Need for Creating a Unified Knowledge of Cardiovascular Diseases in Latin America.Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular registries play an integral role in providing real-world data on a number of cardiovascular conditions and allowing measurement of quality metrics across a large cohort of patients. Over the past 35 years, the number of cardiovascular registries has skyrocketed, and their use will only continue to grow as data on novel procedures and devices will need to be collected and analyzed. The American College of Cardiology and Society of Thoracic Surgeons Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry is just one example of a modern registry that plays a crucial role in collecting data on patients undergoing transcatheter valvular procedures. Through public reporting registries, data can be shared on a hospital and provider level for many quality performance measures. There remains much work to be done on allowing automated data extraction from the electronic medical record directly into registries. No matter how sophisticated and complete a registry is, it can never overcome the problem of treatment selection bias that is inherent in observational data. This review discusses the growth, benefits, and limitations of national registries and their role in developing evidence for best clinical practice, measuring outcomes, providing feedback to clinicians, and improving quality of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.