Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33133229›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental research letters : ERL [Web site]2020

Work Adaptations Insufficient to Address Growing Heat Risk for U.S. Agricultural Workers.

Michelle Tigchelaar, David S Battisti, June T Spector

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental research letters : ERL [Web site], 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Dissemination of Heat Safety Practices Among Florida Farmworker Crews.Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2025
    Article
  12. Heat exposure, heat strain, and off-work recovery of Guatemalan sugarcane workers.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. New York State Climate Impacts Assessment Chapter 03: Agriculture.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Analysis of Exertion-Related Injuries and Fatalities in Laborers in the United States.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. High-Heat Days and Presentations to Emergency Departments in Regional Victoria, Australia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michelle TigchelaarDepartment of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
David S BattistiDepartment of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
June T SpectorDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

Funding

University of Washington Education and Research CenterT42OH008433 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SIMPSON, CHRISTOPHER D · 2005 to 2024
$29.4M
Pacific Northwest Agricultural Safety and Health Center-RenewalU54OH007544 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI YOST, MICHAEL G · 2011 to 2025
$23.0M
NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008433NIOSH CDC HHS U54 OH007544
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The over one million agricultural workers in the United States (U.S.) are amongst the populations most vulnerable to the health impacts of extreme heat. Climate change will further increase this vulnerability. Here we estimate the magnitude and spatial patterns of the growing heat exposure and health risk faced by U.S. crop workers and assess the effect of workplace adaptations on mitigating that risk. We find that the average number of days spent working in unsafe conditions will double by mid-century, and, without mitigation, triple by the end of it. Increases in rest time and the availability of climate-controlled recovery areas can eliminate this risk but could affect farm productivity, farm worker earnings, and/or labor costs much more than alternative measures. Safeguarding the health and well-being of U.S. crop workers will therefore require systemic change beyond the worker and workplace level.

Identifiers

PMID33133229
PMCPMC7594196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.