Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33133028›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2020

Hatching of

Camille Gautier, Lisa Martinez, Sylvain Fournet, Josselin Montarry, Jean-Claude Yvin, Eric Nguema-Ona, Anne-Yvonne Guillerm-Erckelboudt, Christophe Piriou, Juliette Linglin, Christophe Mougel and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Slight induction and strong inhibition ofJournal of nematology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Camille GautierInstitut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (INRAE), UMR1349 IGEPP, Institute of Genetic Environment and Plant Protection, Le Rheu, France.
Lisa MartinezInstitut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (INRAE), UMR1349 IGEPP, Institute of Genetic Environment and Plant Protection, Le Rheu, France.
Sylvain FournetInstitut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (INRAE), UMR1349 IGEPP, Institute of Genetic Environment and Plant Protection, Le Rheu, France.
Josselin MontarryInstitut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (INRAE), UMR1349 IGEPP, Institute of Genetic Environment and Plant Protection, Le Rheu, France.
Jean-Claude YvinCentre Mondial de l'Innovation-Roullier, Laboratoire de Nutrition Végétale - Pôle Stress Biotique, Saint Malo, France.
Eric Nguema-OnaCentre Mondial de l'Innovation-Roullier, Laboratoire de Nutrition Végétale - Pôle Stress Biotique, Saint Malo, France.
Anne-Yvonne Guillerm-ErckelboudtInstitut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (INRAE), UMR1349 IGEPP, Institute of Genetic Environment and Plant Protection, Le Rheu, France.
Christophe PiriouInstitut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (INRAE), UMR1349 IGEPP, Institute of Genetic Environment and Plant Protection, Le Rheu, France.
Juliette LinglinInstitut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (INRAE), UMR1349 IGEPP, Institute of Genetic Environment and Plant Protection, Ploudaniel, France.
Christophe MougelInstitut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (INRAE), UMR1349 IGEPP, Institute of Genetic Environment and Plant Protection, Le Rheu, France.
Lionel LebretonInstitut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (INRAE), UMR1349 IGEPP, Institute of Genetic Environment and Plant Protection, Le Rheu, France.
Institut de Génétique, Environnement et Protection des Plantes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant-parasitic nematodes are among the most harmful pests of cultivated crops causing important economic losses. The ban of chemical nematicides requires the development of alternative agroecological approaches to protect crops against nematodes. For cyst nematodes, egg hatching is stimulated by host plant root exudates. Inducing "suicide hatching" of nematode second-stage juveniles (J2), using root exudates in the absence of the host plant, may constitute an effective and innovative biocontrol method to control cyst nematodes. However, before considering the development of this approach, understanding the effect of soil biotic component on cyst nematode hatching by root exudates is a major issue. The effectiveness of this approach could be modulated by other soil organisms consuming root exudates for growth as soil microbiota, and this must be evaluated. To do that, four different native agricultural soils were selected based on their physicochemical properties and their microbiota composition were characterized by rDNA metabarcoding. To disentangle the effect of microbiota from that of soil on hatching, four recolonized artificial soils were obtained by inoculating a common sterile soil matrix with the microbiota proceeding from each agricultural soil. Each soil was then inoculated with cysts of the potato cyst nematode,

Indexed as

metabarcodingmicrobial compositionplant-parasitic nematodespotatosuicide hatching

Identifiers

PMID33133028
PMCPMC7578397
OpenAlexW3092074597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.