Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33133027›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2020

Mohammad Al-Balawi, Fatthy Mohamed Morsy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. CAUTIon - not all UTIs are the same.Nature reviews. Urology · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Probiotic and Postbiotic Potentials ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Sortase-encoding genes,Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The Many Faces ofMicroorganisms · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Mohammad Al-BalawiBiology Department, Faculty of Science, Taibah University, Medina, Saudi Arabia.
Fatthy Mohamed MorsyBiology Department, Faculty of Science, Taibah University, Medina, Saudi Arabia.
Taibah University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Initial colonization of human gut by bacteria is an important step in controlling its microbiota and health status. This study followed the initial colonization by lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in colon of new born babies through following its occurrence in their stool at first week of their life. The LAB occurrence in the neonates' stool was followed on MRS agar medium. The isolated LAB from male and female newborn babies of normal birth and cesarean section surgical delivery were molecular biologically identified by phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequence. From the 24 investigated newborn babies, three LAB taxa,

Indexed as

Enterococcus faecalisinitial colonizationLacticaseibacillus rhamnosusLimosilactobacillus reuterinewborn babiesstool

Identifiers

PMID33133027
PMCPMC7550472
OpenAlexW3089829064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.