ReviewFrontiers in psychology2020
For the Greater Good? The Devastating Ripple Effects of the Covid-19 Crisis.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed.
- Why Public Health Is Not About Public Goods.Public health ethics · 2025Article
- From Unrealistic to Functional Optimism in Illness Perception: A Psychometric Comparison Across 10 Countries.Scandinavian journal of psychology · 2025Article
- A Global Index to Quantify Discrimination Resulting from COVID-19 Pandemic Response Policies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Response: "Letter to the Editor: Lessons to Be Learned From the COVID-19 Pandemic: Some Further Ideas".International journal of public health · 2025Article
- What Lessons can Be Learned From the Management of the COVID-19 Pandemic?International journal of public health · 2025Review
- Is society caught up in a Death Spiral? Modeling societal demise and its reversal.Frontiers in sociology · 2024Review
- The impact of cognitive bias about infectious diseases on social well-being.Frontiers in epidemiology · 2024Article
- Dual disasters: Seismic evacuation decision-making during COVID-19 lockdown: A case study of Luding earthquake, Sichuan Province.Journal of transport geography · 2023Article
- Article
- Insights from COVID-19: Reflecting on the Promotion of Long-Term Health Policies in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Healthy diets, lifestyle changes and well-being during and after lockdown: longitudinal evidence from the West Midlands.BMJ nutrition, prevention & health · 2022Article
- Superstitious beliefs, locus of control, and feeling at risk in the face of Covid-19.Personality and individual differences · 2022Article
- [Assessing psychological, anxiety, depression and stress levels of Senegalese general population during COVID-19 pandemic].Annales medico-psychologiques · 2022Article
- Article
- Are Lockdowns Effective in Managing Pandemics?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Article
- The COVID-19 pandemic's impact on worry and medical disruptions reported by individuals with chromosome 22q11.2 copy number variants and their caregivers.Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR · 2022Article
- Loss of Weight Gained During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Content Analysis of YouTube Videos.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- Aggressive measures, rising inequalities, and mass formation during the COVID-19 crisis: An overview and proposed way forward.Frontiers in public health · 2022Review
- How Did People Cope During the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Structural Topic Modelling Analysis of Free-Text Data From 11,000 United Kingdom Adults.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the crisis around Covid-19 evolves, it becomes clear that there are numerous negative side-effects of the lockdown strategies implemented by many countries. Currently, more evidence becomes available that the lockdowns may have more negative effects than positive effects. For instance, many measures taken in a lockdown aimed at protecting human life may compromise the immune system, and purpose in life, especially of vulnerable groups. This leads to the paradoxical situation of compromising the immune system and physical and mental health of many people, including the ones we aim to protect. Also, it is expected that hundreds of millions of people will die from hunger and postponed medical treatments. Other side effects include financial insecurity of billions of people, physical and mental health problems, and increased inequalities. The economic and health repercussions of the crisis will be falling disproportionately on young workers, low-income families and women, and thus exacerbate existing inequalities. As the virus outbreak and media coverage spread fear and anxiety, superstition, cognitive dissonance reduction and conspiracy theories are ways to find meaning and reduce anxiety. These behavioral aspects may play a role in the continuance of lockdown decisions. Based on theories regarding agnotology (i.e., the ways ignorance or doubt about certain topics is created by means of withholding or presenting information in a certain way), social influence, superstition and stress and coping, I seek to explain the social and behavioral aspects of human behavior in times of crises. Both the Covid-19 crisis itself as well as the resulting economic and (mental) health crisis are global problems that may require global solutions. I present a model of drivers and outcomes of lockdown behaviors and offer suggestions and a tool to counteract the negative psychological effects by means of online life crafting therapeutic writing interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.