ReviewThe Saudi dental journal2020
Analysis of 100 most cited articles on forensic odontology.
Review in The Saudi dental journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bibliometric insights into molecular and bioinformatic research trends on ameloblastoma.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Cameriere's open apices methodology for dental age estimation in children: a scoping review from a Latin American perspective.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2024Article
- Gonial Angle in Forensic Anthropology to Determine Age and Gender: A Population-Specific Analysis.Cureus · 2024Article
- The 100 top-cited articles in uveitis from 1950 to 2022.International ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Forensic odontology and dental age estimation research: a scoping review a decade after the NAS report on strengthening forensic science.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2023Article
- Clinical Application of Rapid Upper Limb Assessment and Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire in Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Bibliometric Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- A bibliometric analysis on traumatic brain injury in forensic medicine of a half-century (1972-2021).Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Bibliometric Analysis of Top 100 Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Orthopaedic Literature.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2022Review
- Top 100 Cited Publications in the Field of Temporomandibular Disorders: A Bibliometric Analysis.Frontiers in oral health · 2022Review
- A Bibliometric Analysis of 100 Most-Cited Articles on Corneal Cross-Linking.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Bibliometric analysis of randomized controlled trials in oral submucous fibrosis.Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFPReview
- Bibliometric analysis of highly cited papers on oral mucosal lesions in COVID-19: Trends and impact in medical literature.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchReview
- A Bibliometric Analysis of Most Cited Papers on Vesiculobullous Oral Lesions.Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community DentistryReview
- Bibliometric analysis of 100 most cited papers on oral proliferative verrucous leukoplakia.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesBibliometric analysis of best-cited papers brings awareness about the influential publications and trends in the literature on a particular topic. This will help not only the researchers and academicians but also the students for selecting quality landmark articles. With this view in mind a bibliometric analysis was performed to identify the 100 top-cited papers on Forensic Odontology (FO) in the literature. MATERIALS AND
methodsA search was performed using Scopus database in August 2019. The articles were further reviewed and basic standard information related to bibliometric analysis was recorded.
resultsThe 100 most cited articles were published from 1985 to 2014 (77% published after 2001). The most frequently cited article received 259 citations, whereas the least received 31 (mean citations 58.78 ± 33.14). There were 16 different journals with Forensic Science International having the most number of articles (n = 36). One author had 16 articles while 8 authors had 4 or more articles published in the top 100 list. Belgium was the country with most number of articles (n = 17) followed by United States (n = 16). In terms of document type, 87 were original research, 7 conference papers and 6 reviews. Five organizations funded 5 of the top 100 articles. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium affiliated the most documents (n = 16). Majority of the papers were related to age estimation (46) followed by victim identification (30), mass disaster (9), bite mark analysis (8), sex determination (5), race determination (4), dental DNA analysis (3), palatal rugae pattern (2) and lip prints (1).
conclusionThis is first of its kind citation analysis of the 100 most cited articles in the field of FO. The results of this paper will help the researchers, academicians and students for appropriate article referrals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.