ArticleVeterinary world2020
Evaluation of the bacteriocin produced by strain 9 lactic acid bacteria isolate for biopreservation.
Article in Veterinary world, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Oral Antimicrobial Peptide R7I Against Epidemic EnteropathogenicAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Complete genome analysis and antimicrobial mechanism ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Oral supplementation withFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Optimization of fermentation conditions and blending process of fairy bean in North Anhui Province.AMB Express · 2024Article
- Characterization of Extraintestinal PathogenicVeterinary sciences · 2024Article
- Phenotype and genotype of Boerka goats raised in Bali.Veterinary world · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis study aimed to determine the effect of the bacteriocin produced by strain 9 lactic acid bacteria (LAB) isolate on the biopreservation of beef. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe strain 9 LAB isolate was identified conventionally by culturing with de Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe broth medium followed by Gram staining and catalase testing. The molecular confirmation of the isolate involved analyzing the 16S rRNA gene with specific primers, that is, B27F (5-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3) and U1492R (5-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3). Then, the isolate was centrifuged to evaluate the bacteriocin production, and the effect of the biopreservative activity in beef was evaluated by measuring the NH
resultsThis study confirmed that the strain 9 LAB isolate was a strain of
conclusionThis study highlighted the high biopreservative potency of pediocin produced by
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.