ArticleNagoya journal of medical science2020
Therapeutic effect of adipose-derived regenerative cells on bladder function in rats with underactive bladder.
Article in Nagoya journal of medical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bladder neck contracture: incidence, mechanisms, and therapeutic advances.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- Therapeutic effect of adipose stromal vascular fraction spheroids for partial bladder outlet obstruction induced underactive bladder.Stem cell research & therapy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We examined the effect of adipose-derived regenerative cells (ADRC) on bladder functions in a rat model of detrusor underactivity (DU) induced by bladder over-distention. Adult female Sprague Dawley rats were divided into 3 groups: sham group (control); over-distention group; and over-distention with ADRC treatment group. Bladder was over-distended with saline (2.7mL) on day 1, 8, 15 and 22 of the study. ADRCs, which were harvested from male F344 rats, expanded via culture, were injected into the bladder wall at day 15. Cystometry and in vitro organ bath functional studies were performed on day 28. Moreover, histological assessment of the bladder was performed. In cystometry, significant prolongation of the inter-contraction interval (ICI) and decrease of voiding efficiency (VE) were observed in the over-distention group, compared to that in the control group. Significant improvement in ICI and VE was seen in the ADRC treatment group in comparison with the over-distention group. The over-distention group showed significantly weaker bladder contractile responses to carbachol and electrical field stimulation than the control group, while bladder contractile responses were significantly stronger in the ADRC treatment group than that in the over-distention group. The over-distention group showed substantial fibrosis of the bladder compared to the control group, whereas bladder fibrosis was alleviated in the ADRC treatment group. In conclusion, the injection of ADRC into bladder wall improved bladder dysfunction and histological changes induced by bladder over-distention. ADRCs-based regenerative therapy could be novel treatment for DU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.